Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39352881›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Spatial distribution of poultry farms using point pattern modelling: A method to address livestock environmental impacts and disease transmission risks.

Marie-Cécile Dupas, Francesco Pinotti, Chaitanya Joshi, Madhvi Joshi, Weerapong Thanapongtharm, Madhur Dhingra, Damer Blake, Fiona Tomley, Marius Gilbert, Guillaume Fournié

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marie-Cécile DupasSpatial Epidemiology Lab, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8769-2243
Francesco PinottiUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Chaitanya JoshiGujarat Biotechnology Research Centre, Gandhinagar, India.
Madhvi JoshiGujarat Biotechnology Research Centre, Gandhinagar, India.
Weerapong ThanapongtharmDepartment of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, Thailand.
Madhur DhingraEmergency Prevention system for Animal Health, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Damer BlakeDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona TomleyDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Marius GilbertSpatial Epidemiology Lab, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Guillaume FourniéDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

UKRI GCRF One Health Poultry Hub B/S011269/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distribution of farm locations and sizes is paramount to characterize patterns of disease spread. With some regions undergoing rapid intensification of livestock production, resulting in increased clustering of farms in peri-urban areas, measuring changes in the spatial distribution of farms is crucial to design effective interventions. However, those data are not available in many countries, their generation being resource-intensive. Here, we develop a farm distribution model (FDM), which allows the prediction of locations and sizes of poultry farms in countries with scarce data. The model combines (i) a Log-Gaussian Cox process model to simulate the farm distribution as a spatial Poisson point process, and (ii) a random forest model to simulate farm sizes (i.e. the number of animals per farm). Spatial predictors were used to calibrate the FDM on intensive broiler and layer farm distributions in Bangladesh, Gujarat (Indian state) and Thailand. The FDM yielded realistic farm distributions in terms of spatial clustering, farm locations and sizes, while providing insights on the factors influencing these distributions. Finally, we illustrate the relevance of modelling realistic farm distributions in the context of epidemic spread by simulating pathogen transmission on an array of spatial distributions of farms. We found that farm distributions generated from the FDM yielded spreading patterns consistent with simulations using observed data, while random point patterns underestimated the probability of large outbreaks. Indeed, spatial clustering increases vulnerability to epidemics, highlighting the need to account for it in epidemiological modelling studies. As the FDM maintains a realistic distribution of farm location and sizes, its use to inform mathematical models of disease transmission is particularly relevant for regions where these data are not available.

Indexed as

FarmsLivestockPoultryPoultry DiseasesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBangladeshChickensComputational BiologyComputer SimulationModels, StatisticalSpatial AnalysisThailand

Identifiers

PMID39352881
PMCPMC11444418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.