ArticleJAMA network open2024
Hearing Loss, Hearing Aids, and Cognition.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nutritional supplements and cognition in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Pooled it
- Rimegepant for vestibular and cochlear symptoms associated with vertigo in a real-world retrospective study.iScience · 2026Article
- CONSTANCES, the French nationwide population cohort: major accomplishments.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Exploring the Relationship Between Hearing Loss and Cognitive Dysfunction from the Perspective of Molecular Mechanisms.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Mood and Cognitive Disorders Following Hearing Loss: Impact of Hearing Aid Timing.Audiology research · 2026Review
- Pure tone auditory thresholds and their association with cognition in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and temporal validation of a prediction model for cognitive impairment in older adults with hearing loss based on the population health risk management framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Identifying predictors of speech-in-noise perception in older adults with hearing impairment: the key role of working memory.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Is Work-Related Hearing Loss Associated With Dementia? Evidence From a High-Risk Population.American journal of industrial medicine · 2025Article
- Applications of the Stroop Paradigm in Tinnitus: a Scoping Review.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Longitudinal associations between speech-in-noise deficits and cognitive function over 8 years: the role of hearing aid use and environmental noise exposure.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
- Association of sensory and motor impairments with dementia: a cross-sectional analysis in US older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- [Research status and future strategies for refractory inner ear disease].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Review
- Towards universal chemosensory testing: needs, barriers, and opportunities.Chemical senses · 2025Article
- Prediction of hearing aid cognitive outcomes in age-related hearing loss.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Most observational studies examining the association between hearing loss (HL) and cognitive impairment used subjective measures of hearing and addressed only one dimension of cognition, and very few investigated the potential benefit of hearing aids (HAs). Objective: To evaluate objectively measured HL and several dimensions of cognition and estimate the association with HA use. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional analysis of the CONSTANCES cohort study, which recruited participants from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020, was conducted. Participants were a representative sample of adults (age, 45-69 years) with audiometric data and cognitive evaluation from 21 preventive health centers in France. Data analysis was conducted from April 1 to September 15, 2023. Exposure: The main exposure was HL, which was defined by a pure-tone average in the best ear higher than 20 dB hearing level for mild loss and 35 dB hearing level for disabling loss. Secondary exposure was self-reported HA use. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cognition was evaluated at study inclusion by a standardized battery of 5 cognitive tests conducted by trained neuropsychologists. A global cognitive score was computed from principal component analysis and global cognitive impairment was defined as having a score less than or equal to the 25th percentile of the distribution. Results: The study population included 62 072 participants with audiometric data (mean [SD] age, 57.4 [7] years; 52% women). Overall, 38% (n = 23 768) had mild HL, 10% (n = 6012) had disabling HL, and 3% (n = 1668) were HA users. In multivariable analyses, mild HL (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) and disabling HL (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.33) were associated with greater global cognitive impairment. The odds of cognitive impairment did not differ significantly between all participants with HA use and participants with disabling HL without HAs (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83-1.07), except among participants with depression (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, an association between the severity of HL and global cognitive impairment was found. The use of HAs was not associated with significantly lower odds of cognitive impairment. The findings suggest that it may be useful to monitor cognitive function in middle-aged individuals with HL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.