Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39352700›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Hearing Loss, Hearing Aids, and Cognition.

Baptiste Grenier, Claudine Berr, Marcel Goldberg, Xavier Jouven, Marie Zins, Jean-Philippe Empana, Quentin Lisan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Research status and future strategies for refractory inner ear disease].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Baptiste GrenierUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Integrative Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease, Paris, France.
Claudine BerrUniversity of Montpellier, INM, Inserm U1298, Montpellier, France.
Marcel GoldbergUniversité Paris Cité, Population-Based Cohorts Unit, INSERM, Paris Saclay University, UVSQ », UMS 011, Paris, France.
Xavier JouvenUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Integrative Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease, Paris, France.
Marie ZinsUniversité Paris Cité, Population-Based Cohorts Unit, INSERM, Paris Saclay University, UVSQ », UMS 011, Paris, France.
Jean-Philippe EmpanaUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Integrative Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease, Paris, France.
Quentin LisanUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Integrative Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Most observational studies examining the association between hearing loss (HL) and cognitive impairment used subjective measures of hearing and addressed only one dimension of cognition, and very few investigated the potential benefit of hearing aids (HAs). Objective: To evaluate objectively measured HL and several dimensions of cognition and estimate the association with HA use. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional analysis of the CONSTANCES cohort study, which recruited participants from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020, was conducted. Participants were a representative sample of adults (age, 45-69 years) with audiometric data and cognitive evaluation from 21 preventive health centers in France. Data analysis was conducted from April 1 to September 15, 2023. Exposure: The main exposure was HL, which was defined by a pure-tone average in the best ear higher than 20 dB hearing level for mild loss and 35 dB hearing level for disabling loss. Secondary exposure was self-reported HA use. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cognition was evaluated at study inclusion by a standardized battery of 5 cognitive tests conducted by trained neuropsychologists. A global cognitive score was computed from principal component analysis and global cognitive impairment was defined as having a score less than or equal to the 25th percentile of the distribution. Results: The study population included 62 072 participants with audiometric data (mean [SD] age, 57.4 [7] years; 52% women). Overall, 38% (n = 23 768) had mild HL, 10% (n = 6012) had disabling HL, and 3% (n = 1668) were HA users. In multivariable analyses, mild HL (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) and disabling HL (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.33) were associated with greater global cognitive impairment. The odds of cognitive impairment did not differ significantly between all participants with HA use and participants with disabling HL without HAs (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83-1.07), except among participants with depression (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, an association between the severity of HL and global cognitive impairment was found. The use of HAs was not associated with significantly lower odds of cognitive impairment. The findings suggest that it may be useful to monitor cognitive function in middle-aged individuals with HL.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionHearing AidsHearing LossAgedCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39352700
PMCPMC11445684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.