Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39352645›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2024

Can Neuromodulation Improve Sleep and Psychiatric Symptoms?

Charlotte E Luff, Luis de Lecea

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charlotte E LuffDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Luis de LeceaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. llecea@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn this review, we evaluate recent studies that employ neuromodulation, in the form of non-invasive brain stimulation, to improve sleep in both healthy participants, and patients with psychiatric disorders. We review studies using transcranial electrical stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and closed-loop auditory stimulation, and consider both subjective and objective measures of sleep improvement. RECENT

findingsNeuromodulation can alter neuronal activity underlying sleep. However, few studies utilizing neuromodulation report improvements in objective measures of sleep. Enhancements in subjective measures of sleep quality are replicable, however, many studies conducted in this field suffer from methodological limitations, and the placebo effect is robust. Currently, evidence that neuromodulation can effectively enhance sleep is lacking. For the field to advance, methodological issues must be resolved, and the full range of objective measures of sleep architecture, alongside subjective measures of sleep quality, must be reported. Additionally, validation of effective modulation of neuronal activity should be done with neuroimaging.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAcoustic StimulationHumansSleep Wake DisordersBrain stimulationInsomniaNeuromodulationSleep

Identifiers

PMID39352645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.