ReviewInternational journal of hematology2024
Recent progress in AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The diagnostic potential of nanobodies in acute myeloid leukemia.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Transplant outcomes after intensive chemotherapy or venetoclax plus azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.Clinical hematology international · 2026Article
- PAK4 phosphorylates and stabilizes MYC to promote acute myeloid leukemia.Cell insight · 2025Article
- The Prognostic Value of Integrating Copy Number Alteration Profiles inThe application of clinical genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by various molecular abnormalities that significantly impact its pathogenesis and prognosis. Currently, the prognosis of AML patients is stratified on the basis of co-existing chromosomal and genetic abnormalities. AML patients with NPM1 or CEBPA mutations, which are frequently identified in cytogenetically normal AML, are classified in the favorable-risk group, although approximately 40% of patients relapse. Similarly, a clinical high-risk group has been identified among patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia, but the underlying molecular abnormalities remain unclear. FLT3 mutations frequently overlap in these favorable-risk AMLs, including core binding factor AML, and their prognostic impact is still controversial. As such, further risk stratification and treatment optimization based on various molecular abnormalities are warranted to improve the prognosis of favorable-risk AMLs. These molecular abnormalities are also considered therapeutic targets, and targeted therapies have been developed over the years. In recent years, several targeted agents have been approved and demonstrated to improve the prognosis of AML. However, resistance to targeted therapies is also a challenge. This Progress in Hematology features current trends and challenges in favorable-risk AML and FLT3 mutations that are frequently identified in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39352624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.