SynthesisJournal of nephrology2025
Minimal change glomerular disease associated with solid neoplasms: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and prognostic signatures of glomerular membrane dysregulation in immune nephropathies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma in inguinal region complicated with membranous nephropathy: a case report.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Malignancies and glomerulonephritis: when to suspect and when to screen?Clinical kidney journal · 2025Review
- Glomerular disease associated with cancer: a case series of paraneoplastic nephrotic syndrome.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Recurrent paraneoplastic nephrotic syndrome; insights from a Lynch syndrome patient with multiple malignancies.Familial cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParaneoplastic minimal change disease (MCD) has been associated with hematological malignancies, whereas solid malignancies are commonly associated with membranous glomerulonephritis. In this systematic review of the literature, we describe the clinical features, treatment and outcome of MCD associated with solid neoplasms.
methodsWe performed a systematic review of the MEDLINE, COCHRANE, EMBASE and SCOPUS databases, including case reports of adult patients with biopsy-proven MCD and solid malignancy, without language or time restrictions.
resultsSixty-seven papers were included, presenting 86 cases with a mean age of 57.8 ± 14.7 years; 41.0% were women. Nephrotic syndrome was the initial presentation in 96.2% of patients; 67.2% had kidney function impairment, and 21.2% required kidney replacement therapy. The most frequent malignancies were malignant thymoma (34.9%), kidney (14.0%), lung (12.8%), and gastrointestinal tumors (12.8%). In 40.7% of cases, the neoplasm diagnosis preceded MCD by 33.8 ± 46.1 months, while in 31.4%, it followed diagnosis of MCD by 12.4 ± 22.6 months. In 27.9%, the neoplasm and kidney disease were diagnosed simultaneously. Immunosuppressive therapy was started in 79.1% of cases and tumor-specific treatment in 83.7%. Remission of MCD was achieved in 80.2% of patients: 38.2% responded to immunosuppressive treatment alone and 29.6% to oncological treatment alone.
conclusionsThe association between MCD and solid neoplasms is well-documented. Immunosuppressive therapy alone induced nephrotic syndrome remission in over one-third of cases; most others responded to tumor-specific treatment. Solid tumor screening should be considered in MCD independently of the steroid response, though more data on solid tumor-associated MCD prevalence are needed for a definitive statement. PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024521854.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.