ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
Value of miR-31 and miR-150-3p as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for breast cancer.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- miRNAs as emerging predictors of tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe most prevalent malignancy among women is breast cancer (BC). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a role in the initiation and progression of BC by influencing breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) but the diagnostic and prognostic roles of those miRNAs on BC patients are still unknown. It was aimed to investigate expression profiles, diagnostic and prognostic potentials of BCSC-related miRNAs in different subtypes (Luminal A and B, HER2 + and TNBC) of BC patients. METHODS AND
resultsExpression analysis of 15 BCSC-related miRNAs was performed in 50 breast tumor tissues and 20 adjacent non-tumor tissues obtained from BC patients using the qRT-PCR method. The expression levels of miR-31 and miR-150-3p were significantly upregulated in the tumor tissues compared to the adjacent non-tumor tissues (p < 0.05). miR-31 expression upregulated in the Luminal A and Luminal B group compared to non-tumor tissue (p < 0.05). miR-31 expression was determined to be significantly higher in the Luminal group (Luminal A and B) compared to the aggressive group (HER2 + and TNBC) (p < 0.05). According to the ROC analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) of miR-31 and miR-150-3p were 0.66 with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 70%. A significant inverse correlation was observed between miR-31 expression with metastatic carcinoma status, in situ component, and Ki67 value in tumors, and high miR-150-3p expression was correlated with p63 expression (p < 0.05).
conclusionmiR-31 and miR-150-3p have the potential to serve as biomarkers for guiding diagnosis, evaluating prognosis, and metastatic process in patients with BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39352561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.