What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cost analysis of single-use versus reusable bronchoscopes in German intensive care units.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2026
   Article
2. Extracorporal Ovary Bioreactor System with Oxygen Supply and Drug Delivery Option.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Article
3. New approaches to disinfection of thermolabile medical devices using an indirect method with cold atmospheric plasma-aerosol.Scientific reports · 2025
   Article
4. Cost analysis of machine and manual reprocessing of transvaginal ultrasound probes.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum issued
  2026

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.