Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39352462›Full record

GuidelineInternal and emergency medicine2025

Development of an Emergency Department Safety Checklist through a global consensus process.

Lucrezia Rovati, Daniele Privitera, Alexander S Finch, John M Litell, Autumn M Brogan, Aysun Tekin, Claudia Castillo Zambrano, Yue Dong, Ognjen Gajic, Bo E Madsen and 1 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lucrezia RovatiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. l.rovati1@campus.unimib.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1222-9825
Daniele PriviteraASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Department of Emergency Medicine, Milan, Italy.
Alexander S FinchDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
John M LitellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Autumn M BroganDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Aysun TekinMayo Clinic, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, 55905, USA.
Claudia Castillo ZambranoMayo Clinic, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, 55905, USA.
Yue DongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ognjen GajicMayo Clinic, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, 55905, USA.
Bo E MadsenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
CERTAIN ED Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency departments (EDs) are at high risk for medical errors. Checklist implementation programs have been associated with improved patient outcomes in other high-risk clinical settings and when used to address specific aspects of ED care. The aim of this study was to develop an ED Safety Checklist with broad applicability across different international ED settings. A three-round modified Delphi consensus process was conducted with a multidisciplinary and multinational panel of experts in emergency medicine and patient safety. Initial checklist items were identified through a systematic review of the literature. Each item was evaluated for inclusion in the final checklist during two rounds of web-based surveys and an online consensus meeting. Agreement for inclusion was defined a priori with a threshold of 80% combined agreement. Eighty panel members from 34 countries across all seven world regions participated in the study, with comparable representation from low- and middle-income and high-income countries. The final checklist contains 86 items divided into: (1) a general ED Safety Checklist focused on diagnostic evaluation, patient reassessment, and disposition and (2) five domain-specific ED Safety Checklists focused on handoff, invasive procedures, triage, treatment prescription, and treatment administration. The checklist includes key clinical tasks to prevent medical errors, as well as items to improve communication among ED team members and with patients and their families. This novel ED Safety Checklist defines the essential elements of high-quality ED care and has the potential to ensure their consistent implementation worldwide.

Indexed as

ChecklistEmergency Service, HospitalPatient SafetyConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesChecklistDelphi techniqueEmergency departmentMedical errorsPatient safetyQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID39352462
PMCPMC12130094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.