Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39352456›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025

Quantitative in-vitro assessment of a novel robot-assisted system for cochlear implant electrode insertion.

Philipp Aebischer, Lukas Anschuetz, Marco Caversaccio, Georgios Mantokoudis, Stefan Weder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impedance-based tracking of a cochlear implant electrode reliably detects successful array insertion.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Robotic keyhole access to the semicircular canals for vestibular implantation: an anatomical feasibility study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philipp AebischerHearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, 3008, Switzerland. philipp.aebischer@unibe.ch.
Lukas AnschuetzDepartment for Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Marco CaversaccioHearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, 3008, Switzerland.
Georgios MantokoudisDepartment for Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Stefan WederDepartment for Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs an increasing number of cochlear implant candidates exhibit residual inner ear function, hearing preservation strategies during implant insertion are gaining importance. Manual implantation is known to induce traumatic force and pressure peaks. In this study, we use a validated in-vitro model to comprehensively evaluate a novel surgical tool that addresses these challenges through motorized movement of a forceps.

methodsUsing lateral wall electrodes, we examined two subgroups of insertions: 30 insertions were performed manually by experienced surgeons, and another 30 insertions were conducted with a robot-assisted system under the same surgeons' supervision. We utilized a realistic, validated model of the temporal bone. This model accurately reproduces intracochlear frictional conditions and allows for the synchronous recording of forces on intracochlear structures, intracochlear pressure, and the position and deformation of the electrode array within the scala tympani.

resultsWe identified a significant reduction in force variation during robot-assisted insertions compared to the conventional procedure, with average values of 12 mN/s and 32 mN/s, respectively. Robotic assistance was also associated with a significant reduction of strong pressure peaks and a 17 dB reduction in intracochlear pressure levels. Furthermore, our study highlights that the release of the insertion tool represents a critical phase requiring surgical training.

conclusionRobotic assistance demonstrated more consistent insertion speeds compared to manual techniques. Its use can significantly reduce factors associated with intracochlear trauma, highlighting its potential for improved hearing preservation. Finally, the system does not mitigate the impact of subsequent surgical steps like electrode cable routing and cochlear access sealing, pointing to areas in need of further research.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresElectrodes, ImplantedEquipment DesignHumansIn Vitro TechniquesCochlear implantHearing preservationInsertion forceIntracochlear pressureRobot-assisted surgerySoft surgery

Identifiers

PMID39352456
PMCPMC11807918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.