Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39352426›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024

Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Findings and Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction During Pregnancy.

Laura Cattani, Dominique Van Schoubroeck, Adela Samešova, Bram Packet, Susanne Housmans, Jan Deprest

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Female pelvic floor protection-Where do we have to go?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura CattaniDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5232-3619
Dominique Van SchoubroeckDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7233-9527
Adela SamešovaThird Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0969-5761
Bram PacketDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0892-1931
Susanne HousmansDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5148-4883
Jan DeprestDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. Jan.deprest@uzleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-4920-945X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPregnancy and childbirth predispose to pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), coinciding with functional and anatomical changes in the pelvic floor. To some extent, these can be assessed by transperineal ultrasound (TPUS), yet the correlation between ultrasound findings and symptoms has not been well elucidated. We hypothesised that pregnant women with PFD would show different findings at TPUS.

methodsThis is a planned secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. Pregnant women were asked to fill out standardised questionnaires on PFD and undergo TPUS at 12-14 weeks and 28-32 weeks of gestation. We compared bladder neck descent, urethral rotation, retrovesical angle, pelvic organ descent, genital hiatus dimensions and the presence of anal sphincter defects between women with and those without PFD using t test and Fisher's exact test. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the correlation between TPUS findings and PFD severity. As this is a secondary subgroup analysis of participants who underwent TPUS, no sample size was determined upfront.

resultsAt Valsalva, women with urinary incontinence had more pronounced bladder neck descent (p = 0.02) and urethral rotation (p < 0.01), as well as wider retrovesical angles (p = 0.04) and larger genital hiatus areas (p < 0.01). After controlling for age, BMI and parity, the retrovesical angle was the only persistent predictor of urinary incontinence. No correlation was observed between any TPUS marker and symptoms of either prolapse or anorectal dysfunction.

conclusionsIn pregnant women, symptoms of urinary incontinence, but not of prolapse and anorectal dysfunction, are associated with differences in pelvic floor anatomy at TPUS.

Indexed as

Pelvic FloorPelvic Floor DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsAdultAnal CanalFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonographyUrinary IncontinenceAnal incontinenceConstipationGestationPelvic organ prolapseTransperineal ultrasoundUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.