ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Visual reading for [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual interpretation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Enhancing interpretability of AI with radiomics-based deep neural network: proof of concept in the classification of Parkinsonian syndromes withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Longitudinal monitoring of tau aggregation in progressive supranuclear palsy with [Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- From clinical phenotypes to molecular stratification: early differential diagnosis of four-repeat tauopathies.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe identification of tau accumulation within living brains holds significant potential in facilitating accurate diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). While visual assessment is frequently employed, standardized methods for tau positron emission tomography (PET) specifically in PSP are absent. We aimed to develop a visual reading algorithm dedicated to the evaluation of [
methods148 PSP and 30 healthy volunteers were divided into a development set (for the establishment of the reading rules; n = 89) and a testing set (for the validation of the reading rules; n = 89). For differential diagnosis, 55 α-synucleinopathies were additionally included into the testing set. The visual reading method was established by an experienced assessor (Reader 0) and was then validated by Reader 0 and two additional readers on regional and overall binary manners. A positive binding in both midbrain and globus pallidus/putamen regions was characterized as a PSP-like pattern, whereas any other pattern was classified as non-PSP-like.
resultsReader 1 (94.4%) and Reader 2 (93.8%) showed excellent agreement for the overall binary determination against Reader 0. The regional binary determinations of midbrain and globus pallidus/putamen showed excellent agreement among readers (kappa > 0.80). The overall binary evaluation demonstrated reproducibility of 86.1%, 94.4% and 77.8% for three readers. The visual reading algorithm showed high agreement with regional standardized uptake value ratios and clinical diagnoses.
conclusionThrough the application of the suggested visual reading algorithm, [
Indexed as
Identifiers
39352424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.