ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2024
A cortical field theory - dynamics and symmetries.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wave turbulence and cortical dynamics.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cortical dynamics of neural-connectivity fields.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We characterise cortical dynamics using partial differential equations (PDEs), analysing various connectivity patterns within the cortical sheet. This exploration yields diverse dynamics, encompassing wave equations and limit cycle activity. We presume balanced equations between excitatory and inhibitory neuronal units, reflecting the ubiquitous oscillatory patterns observed in electrophysiological measurements. Our derived dynamics comprise lowest-order wave equations (i.e., the Klein-Gordon model), limit cycle waves, higher-order PDE formulations, and transitions between limit cycles and near-zero states. Furthermore, we delve into the symmetries of the models using the Lagrangian formalism, distinguishing between continuous and discontinuous symmetries. These symmetries allow for mathematical expediency in the analysis of the model and could also be useful in studying the effect of symmetrical input from distributed cortical regions. Overall, our ability to derive multiple constraints on the fields - and predictions of the model - stems largely from the underlying assumption that the brain operates at a critical state. This assumption, in turn, drives the dynamics towards oscillatory or semi-conservative behaviour. Within this critical state, we can leverage results from the physics literature, which serve as analogues for neural fields, and implicit construct validity. Comparisons between our model predictions and electrophysiological findings from the literature - such as spectral power distribution across frequencies, wave propagation speed, epileptic seizure generation, and pattern formation over the cortical surface - demonstrate a close match. This study underscores the importance of utilizing symmetry preserving PDE formulations for further mechanistic insights into cortical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.