ArticleRadiology2024
Four-dimensional Flow MRI-based Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation for Noninvasive Portosystemic Pressure Gradient Assessment in Patients with Cirrhosis and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.
Article in Radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical applications of 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging in hepatic vascular disorders: practical biomarkers, protocol design, and translational implementation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- The emerging role of 4D flow MRI in abdominal interventional radiology.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics analysis of portal vein hemodynamics before and after balloon angioplasty following living donor liver transplantation: a proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Hepatic enhancement and signal intensity analysis on magnetic resonance imaging as prognostic biomarkers in advanced chronic liver disease.World journal of hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) dysfunction in patients with liver cirrhosis and recurrent symptoms of portal hypertension is primarily assessed with US and confirmed with invasive catheter venography, which can be used to measure the portosystemic pressure gradient (PSPG) to identify TIPS-refractory portal hypertension. To avoid the risks and costs of invasive catheter venography, noninvasive PSPG evaluation strategies are needed. Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of the combination of four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for noninvasive PSPG assessment in participants with cirrhosis and TIPS. Materials and Methods Abdominal 4D flow MRI was performed prospectively in participants with cirrhosis and TIPS between January 2019 and September 2020. Flow rates were measured within the TIPS and inferior vena cava (IVC). The portal vein (PV), TIPS, right hepatic vein, and IVC were segmented on MRI scans to create a CFD mesh. The PV and infrahepatic IVC were defined as inflows for 4D flow MRI-derived flow rates. The suprahepatic IVC was defined as the outflow. CFD simulations were used to noninvasively estimate PSPG as the difference between the simulated pressures in the PV and suprahepatic IVC. Invasive venographic measurements of the PSPG served as the reference standard, and Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between noninvasive estimates and invasive measurements. Results In all 20 participants with cirrhosis (mean age, 58 years ± 9 [SD]; 11 men), 4D flow MRI-based CFD simulations enabled visualization of flow velocities and pressure distributions within the segmented vasculature and TIPS. Noninvasive estimates and invasive measures of PSPG were strongly correlated (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.