Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39352219›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

Family planning policy and gender in Nigeria: A thematic analysis of the government's health policy perspective.

Obreniokibo Ibifubara Amiesimaka, Shahin Payam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Obreniokibo Ibifubara AmiesimakaChair of Sociology of Diversity, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1473-3224
Shahin PayamChair of Sociology of Diversity, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5461-5578

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family Planning (FP) lets people control the number and timing of child-births through using contraceptives and/or restoring fertility. Nigeria has several FP policies for managing its population, yet contraceptives usage remains suboptimal despite high FP awareness, suggesting that several factors might be inhibiting FP uptake. The literature spotlights gender as factoring into FP use due to Nigeria's patriarchal society, with men positioned as gatekeepers to women's sexual/reproductive health/expression. Therefore, we investigate if/how gender is considered in Nigeria's FP policies. We thematically analysed the 'National Reproductive Health Policy', 'National Family Planning Communication Plan' and 'Nigeria Family Planning Blueprint (Scale-Up Plan)', from a critical realist viewpoint. Our analysis generated an overarching theme-'A Gendered Human Right', with three further themes: Women's Right-Women's Issue', 'Adolescent Girls-not left out' and 'Men's Right as Supporters'. FP was portrayed as the right of women, adolescents (particularly girls ≥ 10 yrs) and men. It was highly feminised, with women, not men, majorly shouldering the FP responsibility and women's FP access was presented as hindered by men. Moreover, we advance recommendations for optimising Nigeria's policies to address gender imbalances hampering women's FP access and uphold the rights of all people, women/girls especially.

Indexed as

Family Planning PolicyFamily Planning ServicesHealth PolicyAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleNigeriaReproductive HealthSex FactorsWomen's Rightsfamily planninggenderNigeriapolicythematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID39352219
PMCPMC11851051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.