Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351800›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Evaluation of posterior mitral isthmus ablation in the absence of a vein of Marshall.

Clara François, Milad El Haddad, Benjamin De Becker, Maarten De Smet, Jean-Benoît Le Polain de Waroux, René Tavernier, Mattias Duytschaever, Sébastien Knecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Clara FrançoisDienst Cardiologie, AZ Sint Jan Brugge, Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7341-5640
Milad El HaddadDienst Cardiologie, AZ Sint Jan Brugge, Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9436-7820
Benjamin De BeckerDienst Cardiologie, AZ Sint Jan Brugge, Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1839-3693
Maarten De SmetDienst Cardiologie, AZ Sint Jan Brugge, Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1885-7606
Jean-Benoît Le Polain de WarouxDienst Cardiologie, AZ Sint Jan Brugge, Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1737-1353
René TavernierDienst Cardiologie, AZ Sint Jan Brugge, Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4575-5231
Mattias DuytschaeverDienst Cardiologie, AZ Sint Jan Brugge, Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8451-0013
Sébastien KnechtDienst Cardiologie, AZ Sint Jan Brugge, Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4500-0146

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAchieving acute and durable mitral isthmus (MI) block remains challenging using radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation alone. Vein of Marshall (VoM) ethanolization results in chemical damage along the MI resulting in the creation of a durable transmural lesion with a very high rate of procedural block. However, no studies have systematically assessed the efficacy of MI ablation alone when no anatomical VoM is present. METHODS AND

resultsThirty seven patients without VoM evidenced after careful angiographic examination were included. Ablation parameters and result were compared with a matched control group in whom the posterior MI line was performed without assessing the presence of the VoM. Mitral isthmus block was achieved in 36 out of 37 patients without VoM (97%), with endocardial ablation only in 5/37 (14%) and combined endocardial and coronary sinus ablation in 32/37 patients (86%). There was a significant difference in the occurrence of block between patients without a VoM and the control group (97.3% vs. 65% respectively, P < 0.01), with a trend towards less needed RF {26 [interquartile range (IQR) 20-38] vs. 29 [IQR 19-40] tags [P = 0.8], 611 [IQR 443-805] vs. 746 [IQR 484-1193] seconds [P = 0.08]}.

conclusionThe absence of a VoM is associated with a very high rate of procedural block during posterior MI ablation. The higher rate of MI block in this specific population would also suggest the crucial role of the VoM (when present) in resistant MI block.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationMitral ValveAgedCase-Control StudiesCoronary SinusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary VeinsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationAtrial flutterMitral isthmus lineRadiofrequency ablationVein of Marshall

Identifiers

PMID39351800
PMCPMC11500601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.