Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351763›Full record

ReviewVeterinary ophthalmology2025

Reconstruction of deep and perforating corneal defects in dogs-A review (Part III/III): The use of corneal sutures and reporting of ocular discomfort.

R F Sanchez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R F SanchezSpecialistische Dierenkliniek Utrecth (SDU-AniCura), Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-0042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgical reconstruction of severe corneal disease is a common and crucial component of the clinical practice of veterinary ophthalmology. The first part of the present review described procedures that utilize autogenous ocular tissues, homologous donor tissues, and heterologous donor tissues in dogs, while the second part reviewed the use of biomaterials and keratoprosthetics in this species. This third part is dedicated to the review of the use of corneal sutures including suture type and suture pattern in corneal reconstruction of small animals including dogs and cats. The review also focused on the way studies report postoperative ocular discomfort/pain and how this is treated. Lastly, the author briefly presents the simple but effective techniques available to bury corneal knots for corneal reconstructive surgery in small animal patients, such as the "tugging" and "deep-superficial-superficial-deep" methods for simple interrupted sutures, and the adaptation of the latter for simple continuous sutures.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesDog DiseasesSuture TechniquesAnimalsDogsSuturesburied suturecorneal reconstructiondeep‐superficial‐superficial‐deepmicrosuturesuture tracksuture tug

Identifiers

PMID39351763
PMCPMC11911955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.