ArticleClinical oral implants research2025
Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration of the Posterior Mandible to Allow Implant Placement: 1-Year Prospective Study Results.
Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03028922 (A Prospective, Multi-centre Study Evaluating Creos™ Xenogain Bone Graft Substitute in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in the Premolar and Molar Region of the Mandible), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multi-centre Study Evaluating Creos™ Xenogain Bone Graft Substitute in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in the Premolar and Molar Region of the Mandible
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collagen Membrane Fixation Technique Affects Its Space Maintenance Capacity After Flap Closure: An Ex Vivo Analysis.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Pilot Case Series of Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using a Collagenated Porcine-Derived Xenograft: Clinical, Histological, and Remodeling Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Early Clinical Outcomes of Full-Arch Rehabilitations with Immediately Loaded Implants with Buccal Dehiscence Treated with Horizontal Augmentation: A 1-Year Retrospective Case Series.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of two surgical approaches for vertical ridge augmentation in the mandible.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Periosteal-secured suture and fixation device in horizontal guided bone regeneration: a retrospective study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Soft-Tissue Volume Augmentation at Dental Implant Placement Using Collagen-Based Matrix Characterized by Oriented Open Pore Structure: A Retrospective Study with a Median Follow-Up of 17 Months.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Sloped-Shoulder Implants in the Posterior Mandible: A Retrospective Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes in Intraoral Bone Block Augmentation Compared to GBR Procedures Prior to Implant Placement: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Customized 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Scoping Review of Workflows, Technology, and Materials.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Implant success in grafted vs non-grafted posterior mandibular sites: A clinical study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAssess whether horizontal ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM), autologous bone, and a resorbable collagen membrane supports successful implant placement. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis open, prospective, single-cohort, multicenter clinical study included patients with ridge defects that required GBR prior to implant insertion. The primary endpoint was radiologically assessed bone gain after 8 months post-GBR, measured at the center of planned implant sites. Secondary endpoints included implant survival and success, marginal bone levels (MBLs), MBL changes, and soft tissue health.
resultsOf 45 patients evaluated 8 months post-GBR, nine experienced dehiscence in the first 3 weeks of the healing period. GBR led to radiologically determined mean bone width gain of 4.0 ± 1.5 mm and 4.8 ± 1.7 mm, measured 1 and 3 mm from the top of the crest, respectively, allowing successful implant placement in 44 patients (97.8%). The cumulative implant survival and success rates were 98.9% and 95.5%, respectively. MBLs were stable: -1.18 ± 0.64 mm at definitive prosthesis placement (DPP) and - 1.07 ± 0.74 mm at 1 year. Soft tissue health and esthetics (plaque and bleeding indices, papilla, keratinized mucosa, and pink esthetic score) improved from DPP to 1 year. Patients were highly satisfied with implant function and esthetics, and their oral health-related quality of life improved.
conclusionsGBR using DBBM and a collagen membrane offered a safe and effective treatment option for horizontal ridge augmentation sufficient to support implant-based tooth rehabilitation.
trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03028922 (registrations sites, as above listed affiliations, first posted January 23, 2017).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.