Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351631›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Spoofing attack recognition for GNSS-based train positioning using a BO-LightGBM method.

Jiaqi Bi, Jiang Liu, Baigen Cai, Jian Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiaqi BiSchool of Automation and Intelligence, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0000-9577-3505
Jiang LiuSchool of Automation and Intelligence, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Baigen CaiSchool of Automation and Intelligence, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Jian WangSchool of Automation and Intelligence, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trustworthy positioning is critical in the operational control and management of trains. For a train positioning system (TPS) based on a global navigation satellite system (GNSS), a spoofing attack significantly threatens the trustworthiness of positioning. However, the influence and recognition of GNSS spoofing attacks are not considered in the existing research on GNSS-enabled TPS. Spoofing attacks affect the performance of GNSS observations and the positioning results, allowing the development of data-driven spoofing recognition solutions. This study aims to achieve effective spoofing recognition for active security protection in TPS. Different features were designed to reflect the effects of a spoofing attack, including GNSS observation-related indicators and odometer-enabled parameters, and a novel Bayesian optimization-light gradient boosting machine (BO-LightGBM) solution was proposed. In particular, a Bayesian optimization technique was introduced into the LightGBM framework to improve the hyperparameter determination capability for recognition model training. Using a GNSS spoofing test platform with a specific GNSS signal generator and the SimSAFE spoofing test tool, different spoofing attack modes were tested to collect sample datasets for model training and evaluation. The results of model establishment and comparison of the model performance indicators illustrated the advantages of the proposed solution, its adaptability to different spoofing attack situations, and its superiority over state-of-the-art modeling strategies.

Indexed as

machine learningRailwayrecognition modelspoofing attacktrain positioning system

Identifiers

PMID39351631
PMCPMC11450585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.