Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351588›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2024

Implementation of a novel daily performance improvement checklist (PIC) improves alcohol screening and intervention compliance in trauma.

Michelle Jeffery, Ashley Toussaint, Rachel L Choron, Zachary P Englert, Charoo Piplani, Timothy Murphy, Lisa A Falcon, Mayur Narayan, Amanda L Teichman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michelle JefferySurgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Ashley ToussaintSurgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Rachel L ChoronRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Zachary P EnglertSurgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Charoo PiplaniAcute Care Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Timothy MurphySurgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Lisa A FalconSurgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Mayur NarayanSurgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Amanda L TeichmanSurgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4120-8345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has demonstrated up to 50% reduction in alcohol-related traumatic injury and is mandated by the American College of Surgeons for trauma center accreditation. While SBIRT effectiveness has been previously investigated, optimal implementation in the trauma setting has not. We sought to improve SBIRT compliance through integration of screening into a performance improvement checklist (PIC) deployed during morning report. We hypothesized that PIC would establish a self-sustaining model for improved alcohol screening/intervention. Methods: This was a retrospective study comparing trauma patients pre-PIC (January-May 2022) to post-PIC (January-May 2023) after PIC implementation in January 2023. The primary outcome was SBIRT performance. The PIC prompted alcohol intervention specialist consultation if blood alcohol content >80 mg/dL, <21 years old, or Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test ≥8. Significance was determined if p<0.05. Results: There were 705 pre-PIC and 840 post-PIC patients. Pre-PIC unscreened patients were more often uninsured (13% vs. 25%, p<0.01) and black (8% vs. 14%, p=0.02) compared with screened pre-PIC patients. There were no significant differences among screened versus unscreened patients after PIC with respect to age, sex, race, or ethnicity (p>0.05). Overall, screening improved pre-PIC to post-PIC (52% vs. 88%, p<0.01) and the percentage of patients who screened positively also increased after PIC (8% vs. 23%, p<0.01). Brief intervention was unchanged (83% vs. 81%, p=1). Conclusion: The PIC is a novel tool that demonstrated improved alcohol screening and referral. It improved compliance with SBIRT and reduced implicit bias in the population screened. Utilization of a PIC is easily translatable to other centers and could become a national standard to advance performance improvement. Level of evidence: IV.

Indexed as

alcoholismchecklistquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID39351588
PMCPMC11440234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.