Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351496›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2024

The impact of the nurse practice environment, workload, and professional support on job outcomes and standards of care at primary health care clinics in South Africa: A structural equation model approach.

Prudence Ditlopo, Laetitia C Rispel, Peter Van Bogaert, Duane Blaauw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prudence DitlopoCentre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 27 St Andrew's Road, Parktown, 2193, South Africa.
Laetitia C RispelCentre for Health Policy & South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 27 St Andrew's Road, Parktown, 2193, South Africa.
Peter Van BogaertCentre for Research and Innovation, Workforce Management and Outcome Research in Care, Primary Care Academy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken Lokaal D.R.333, Universiteitsplein 1 B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Duane BlaauwCentre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 27 St Andrew's Road, Parktown, 2193, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is substantial evidence on the associations between a positive nurse practice environment and improved nurse and patient outcomes, as well as the factors that mediate these associations, in high-income countries and in hospital settings. The knowledge gaps in African and primary health care settings motivated this empirical study. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the dimensions of the nurse practice environment, specifically human resource management, foundations for nursing care, and participation in clinic affairs, on job outcomes and standards of care. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2021 and June 2022. Setting: 180 primary health care clinics in two South African provinces of Gauteng and North West. Participants: 665 nurses of all categories. Methods: A causal model was developed with pathways between the nurse practice environment dimensions and the outcomes of job satisfaction, intention to leave, and standards of care. A set of standardised instruments was used to measure the study variables. Using structural equation modelling, workload and professional support were tested as potential mediators between the nurse practice environment and the outcome variables. Results: The nurses scored the domain of foundations for nursing care 71.2 out of 100 on average, indicating high agreement, while the mean scores for nurses' participation in clinic affairs and human resources management were lower at 68.0 and 61.7 respectively. Although nurses expressed moderate satisfaction with professional support (67.7), they were less satisfied with their workload (52.2). The mean score of overall job satisfaction was moderate (58.9), with 53.8 % of the nurses reporting that they intended leaving the clinic where they were working. Thirty-six percent intended leaving the nursing profession, indicating low intention to stay. The final mediation model was judged to fit the data adequately based on goodness-of-fit indices, confirming that workload and professional support had a mediating role between the nurse practice environment dimensions of interest and both nurses' job outcomes and standards of care. Conclusions: We have highlighted the value of supportive practice environments, effective workload management, and enhanced professional support in improving nurses' job outcomes and satisfaction with standards of care. Improving nurses' practice environments at primary health care level may have a wide-ranging impact on the performance of the health system. Therefore, primary health care facility managers should ensure that workload is distributed equitably, professional support for nurses is enhanced, and the overall work environment is improved.

Indexed as

Intention to leaveJob satisfactionNurse practice environmentPrimary health careProfessional supportSouth AfricaStandards of careStructural equation modelWorkload

Identifiers

PMID39351496
PMCPMC11440313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.