Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351466›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2024

How to "pick up" colorectal serrated lesions and polyps in daily histopathology practice: From terminologies to diagnostic pitfalls.

Thai H Tran, Vinh H Nguyen, Diem Tn Vo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07601230 (Efficacy of a Polyp Pretreatment Device in Improving Diagnosis of Sessile Serrated Lesions in Colorectal Polyps), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07601230 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of a Polyp Pretreatment Device in Improving Diagnosis of Sessile Serrated Lesions in Colorectal Polyps

TypeinterventionalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled1,156ConditionsSessile Serrated LesionArmsPolyp Pretreatment Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thai H TranDepartment of Pathology, Da Nang Hospital, Da Nang 50000, Viet Nam.
Vinh H NguyenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 70000, Viet Nam.
Diem Tn VoDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh 70000, Viet Nam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, our knowledge of colorectal serrated polyps and lesions has significantly improved due to numerous studies on this group of precursor lesions. Serrated lesions were misleading as benign before 2010, but they are currently reclassified as precancerous lesions that contribute to 30% of colorectal cancer through the serrated neoplasia pathway. The World Health Organization updated the classification for serrated lesions and polyps of the colon and rectum in 2019, which is more concise and applicable in daily practice. The responsible authors prescribe that "colorectal serrated lesions and polyps are characterized by a serrated (sawtooth or stellate) architecture of the epithelium." From a clinical standpoint, sessile serrated lesion (SSL) and SSL with dysplasia (SSLD) are the two most significant entities. Despite these advancements, the precise diagnosis of SSL and SSLD based mainly on histopathology remains challenging due to various difficulties. This review describes the nomenclature and the terminology of colorectal serrated polyps and lesions and highlights the diagnostic criteria and obstacles encountered in the histopathological diagnosis of SSL and SSLD.

Indexed as

Benign hyperplastic polypsSerrated lesions/polypsSerrated polypsSessile serrated adenomaSessile serrated lesionsSessile serrated lesions with dysplasia

Identifiers

PMID39351466
PMCPMC11438847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.