ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2024
Evaluation of antenatal care quality for preterm birth prevention using an auditable scoring system: A retrospective, descriptive, longitudinal study in Sydney, Australia.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreterm birth continues to be one of the most significant contributors to perinatal death. This study aims to evaluate the quality of antenatal care provided to women delivering preterm.
methodsThis was a retrospective, descriptive, longitudinal review of all women who had antenatal care within a single Australian tertiary hospital and delivered spontaneously between 24 and 37 weeks of gestation, using an auditable scoring system assessing potential interventions for prevention of preterm birth. The review was limited to singleton pregnancies without fetal abnormalities delivering between January 2013 and April 2015. The audit tool was developed by reference to established 'best practice' guidance for prediction and prevention of preterm birth based on Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines and published literature. Different pathways were assessed for women deemed either low- or high-risk at the outset of antenatal care.
resultsA series of 161 pregnancies that delivered preterm (between 24 and 37 weeks' gestation) were reviewed. The quality of antenatal care was scored 'good' in 42.9% and 50% of high-risk and low-risk women, respectively. Care was scored 'adequate', with room for improvement in 51.4% and 45.2% of the two corresponding groups. The main deficiencies in care were recorded evidence of assessment of cervical length (absent in 35% of cases) and failure to screen for bacterial vaginosis in high-risk women.
conclusionsAuditing antenatal care for prevention of preterm birth allows identification of suboptimal practice allowing service improvement and potential intervention for preterm birth prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.