Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351374›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Reliability of motion phase identification for long-track speed skating using inertial measurement units.

Tomoki Iizuka, Yosuke Tomita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomoki IizukaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kurosawa Hospital, Takasaki, Gunma, Japan.
Yosuke TomitaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health Care, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Takasaki, Gunma, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Precise identification of motion phases in long-track speed skating is critical to characterize and optimize performance. This study aimed to estimate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of movement phase identification using inertial measurement units (IMUs) in long-track speed skating. Methods: We analyzed 15 skaters using IMUs attached to specific body locations during a 500m skate, focusing on the stance phase, and identifying three movement events: Onset, Edge-flip, and Push-off. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: Results showed high intra- and inter-rater reliability (ICC [1,1]: 0.86 to 0.99; ICC [2,1]: 0.81 to 0.99) across all events. Absolute error ranged from 0.56 to 6.15 ms and from 0.92 to 26.29 ms for intra- and inter-rater reliability, respectively. Minimally detectable change (MDC) ranged from 17.56 to 62.22 ms and from 33.23 to 131.25 ms for intra- and inter-rater reliability, respectively. Discussion: Despite some additive and proportional errors, the overall error range was within acceptable limits, indicating negligible systematic errors. The measurement error range was small, demonstrating the accuracy of IMUs. IMUs demonstrate high reliability in movement phase identification during speed skating, endorsing their application in sports science for enhanced kinematic studies and training.

Indexed as

SkatingAccelerometryAdultAthletic PerformanceBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMovementObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultBiomechanicsInertial measurement unitKinematicsReliabilitySpeed skating

Identifiers

PMID39351374
PMCPMC11441384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.