Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351364›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Advanced CNN models in gastric cancer diagnosis: enhancing endoscopic image analysis with deep transfer learning.

Priya Bhardwaj, SeongKi Kim, Apeksha Koul, Yogesh Kumar, Ankur Changela, Jana Shafi, Muhammad Fazal Ijaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Priya Bhardwaj *Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), Tula's Institute, Dehradun, India.
SeongKi Kim *Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, India.
Apeksha KoulSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Technology, Bennett University, Greater Noida, India.
Yogesh KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, India.
Ankur ChangelaDepartment of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, India.
Jana ShafiDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information, College of Engineering in Wadi Alddawasir, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Alddawasir, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Fazal IjazSchool of Information Technology (IT) and Engineering, Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid advancement of science and technology has significantly expanded the capabilities of artificial intelligence, enhancing diagnostic accuracy for gastric cancer. Methods: This research aims to utilize endoscopic images to identify various gastric disorders using an advanced Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model. The Kvasir dataset, comprising images of normal Z-line, normal pylorus, ulcerative colitis, stool, and polyps, was used. Images were pre-processed and graphically analyzed to understand pixel intensity patterns, followed by feature extraction using adaptive thresholding and contour analysis for morphological values. Five deep transfer learning models-NASNetMobile, EfficientNetB5, EfficientNetB6, InceptionV3, DenseNet169-and a hybrid model combining EfficientNetB6 and DenseNet169 were evaluated using various performance metrics. Results & discussion: For the complete images of gastric cancer, EfficientNetB6 computed the top performance with 99.88% accuracy on a loss of 0.049. Additionally, InceptionV3 achieved the highest testing accuracy of 97.94% for detecting normal pylorus, while EfficientNetB6 excelled in detecting ulcerative colitis and normal Z-line with accuracies of 98.8% and 97.85%, respectively. EfficientNetB5 performed best for polyps and stool with accuracies of 98.40% and 96.86%, respectively.The study demonstrates that deep transfer learning techniques can effectively predict and classify different types of gastric cancer at early stages, aiding experts in diagnosis and detection.

Indexed as

contour featuresdeep learninggastric cancermedical imagestransfer learningulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID39351364
PMCPMC11439627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.