ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Advanced CNN models in gastric cancer diagnosis: enhancing endoscopic image analysis with deep transfer learning.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Swarm Intelligence-Guided Hybrid Transfer Learning for Gastrointestinal Polyp Classification.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning-driven advancements in gastrointestinal cancer: Paving the way for precision medicine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Lightweight deep learning model for gastrointestinal precancerous lesion screening with attention enhancement.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- AI-Powered Insights into Drug Resistance in Gastric Cancer: A Path Toward Precision Therapy.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPRReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The rapid advancement of science and technology has significantly expanded the capabilities of artificial intelligence, enhancing diagnostic accuracy for gastric cancer. Methods: This research aims to utilize endoscopic images to identify various gastric disorders using an advanced Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model. The Kvasir dataset, comprising images of normal Z-line, normal pylorus, ulcerative colitis, stool, and polyps, was used. Images were pre-processed and graphically analyzed to understand pixel intensity patterns, followed by feature extraction using adaptive thresholding and contour analysis for morphological values. Five deep transfer learning models-NASNetMobile, EfficientNetB5, EfficientNetB6, InceptionV3, DenseNet169-and a hybrid model combining EfficientNetB6 and DenseNet169 were evaluated using various performance metrics. Results & discussion: For the complete images of gastric cancer, EfficientNetB6 computed the top performance with 99.88% accuracy on a loss of 0.049. Additionally, InceptionV3 achieved the highest testing accuracy of 97.94% for detecting normal pylorus, while EfficientNetB6 excelled in detecting ulcerative colitis and normal Z-line with accuracies of 98.8% and 97.85%, respectively. EfficientNetB5 performed best for polyps and stool with accuracies of 98.40% and 96.86%, respectively.The study demonstrates that deep transfer learning techniques can effectively predict and classify different types of gastric cancer at early stages, aiding experts in diagnosis and detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.