Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351258›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2024

Effects of intervention by trained care managers on advance care planning engagement among long-term care service users in Japan: a pre- and post-pilot comparative study across multiple institutions.

Shozo Okochi, Kyoko Oshiro, Noriyasu Takeuchi, Mariko Miyamichi, Tomoe Nakamura, Terumi Matsushima, Masako Okada, Yoshimi Kudo, Takehiro Ishiyama, Tomoyasu Kinoshita and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shozo OkochiSocial Welfare Corporation Yotsubakai, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Kyoko OshiroWabisabi Home Care Support Office, Chita, Aichi, Japan.
Noriyasu TakeuchiMagokoro Home Care Support Office, Chita, Aichi, Japan.
Mariko MiyamichiYorozu Soudanjyo Co. Ltd, Konan, Aichi, Japan.
Tomoe NakamuraCare Plan Tsuyukusa Home Care Support Office, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Terumi MatsushimaKagayaki Home Care Support Office, Ichinomiya, Aichi, Japan.
Masako OkadaSuito Home Care Support Office, Kuwana, Mie, Japan.
Yoshimi KudoNichii Care Center Koudunomori Home Care Support Office, Narita, Chiba, Japan.
Takehiro IshiyamaSocial Medical Corporation Dohoku Kinsho Soya Clinic Designated Home Care Support Office, Wakkanai, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tomoyasu KinoshitaNational Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Aichi, Japan.
Hideki KojimaNational Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Aichi, Japan.
Mitsunori NishikawaEnd-of-Life Care Team, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Morioka-cho, 7-430, Obu, Aichi 474-8511, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6325-808X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A majority of Japanese care managers lack medical qualifications, feel uncomfortable discussing future medical choices and believe that it is not their responsibility. Objectives: As there is a paucity of care manager intervention studies, this study aimed to measure changes in advance care planning engagement among long-term care service users before and after intervention by care managers with communication training. Design: A multi-institutional pre- and post-pilot comparative study. Methods: A multi-institutional pre- and post-trial study was performed from August 2022 to January 2023 (trial ID: 000048573). Nine trained care managers communicated with 30 long-term care service users regarding advance care planning, and the pre- and post-trial advance care planning engagement scores were compared. Additionally, the post-trial impact of events score was investigated. Results: All 30 long-term care service users completed the trial. The advance care planning engagement score increased after the trial. The sample size was considered adequate for future trials. Years of experience as a care manager, impact of events score, and having a clinical frailty scale of ⩾5 were significant explanatory variables that affected the objective variable of the difference between pre- and post-trial advance care planning engagement score. Conclusion: This study on the impact of advance care planning communication interventions by trained care managers offers insights into determining appropriate sample sizes and identifying factors influencing future research outcomes. Advance care planning engagement of long-term care service users might change before and after intervention by care managers through advance care planning communication. Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information (UMIN) Network Trial ID: 000048573.

Indexed as

advance care planningcase managerscommunityfrailty

Identifiers

PMID39351258
PMCPMC11440549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.