ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2024
From
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual cell: Current perspectives and future prospects.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Beyond the mouse: 3R-guided alternative animal models transforming cancer research.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Who's afraid of synthetic data? Hybrid approaches to deliver medical digital twins.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2026Article
- Improving 3D deep learning segmentation with biophysically motivated cell synthesis.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D cell culture models replicate tissue complexity and aim to study cellular interactions and responses in a more physiologically relevant environment compared to traditional 2D cultures. However, the spherical structure of these models makes it difficult to extract meaningful data, necessitating advanced techniques for proper analysis. In silico simulations enhance research by predicting cellular behaviors and therapeutic responses, providing a powerful tool to complement experimental approaches. Despite their potential, these simulations often require advanced computational skills and significant resources, which creates a barrier for many researchers. To address these challenges, we developed an accessible pipeline using open-source software to facilitate virtual tissue simulations. Our approach employs the Cellular Potts Model, a versatile framework for simulating cellular behaviors in tissues. The simulations are constructed from real world 3D image stacks of cancer spheroids, ensuring that the virtual models are rooted in experimental data. By introducing a new metric for parameter optimization, we enable the creation of realistic simulations without requiring extensive computational expertise. This pipeline benefits researchers wanting to incorporate computational biology into their methods, even if they do not possess extensive expertise in this area. By reducing the technical barriers associated with advanced computational modeling, our pipeline enables more researchers to utilize these powerful tools. Our approach aims to foster a broader use of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.