ArticleData in brief2024
Pixel-wise annotation for clear and contaminated regions segmentation in wireless capsule endoscopy images: A multicentre database.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision enhancement in wireless capsule endoscopy: a novel transformer-based approach for real-time video object detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Objective Evaluation of Small Bowel Visualization Quality in Wireless Capsule Endoscopy Images Using Generative Adversarial Network.Advanced biomedical research · 2025Article
- Pixel-wise annotation for clear and contaminated regions segmentation in wireless capsule endoscopy images: A multicentre database.Data in brief · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) is capable of non-invasively visualizing the small intestine, the most complicated segment of the gastrointestinal tract, to detect different types of abnormalities. However, its main drawback is reviewing the vast number of captured images (more than 50,000 frames). The recorded images are only sometimes clear, and different contaminating agents, such as turbid materials and air bubbles, degrade the visualization quality of the WCE images. This condition could cause serious problems such as reducing mucosal view visualization, prolonging recorded video reviewing time, and increasing the risks of missing pathology. On the other hand, accurately quantifying the amount of turbid fluids and bubbles can indicate potential motility malfunction. To assist in developing computer vision-based techniques, we have constructed the first multicentre publicly available clear and contaminated annotated dataset by precisely segmenting 17,593 capsule endoscopy images from three different databases. In contrast to the existing datasets, our dataset has been annotated at the pixel level, discriminating the clear and contaminated regions and subsequently differentiating bubbles and turbid fluids from normal tissue. To create the dataset, we first selected all of the images (2906 frames) in the reduced mucosal view class covering different levels of contamination and randomly selected 12,237 images from the normal class of the copyright-free CC BY 4.0 licensed small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) images from the Kvasir capsule endoscopy database. To mitigate the possible available bias in the mentioned dataset and to increase the sample size, the number of 2077 and 373 images have been stochastically chosen from the SEE-AI project and CECleanliness datasets respectively for the subsequent annotation. Randomly selected images have been annotated with the aid of ImageJ and ITK-SNAP software under the supervision of an expert SBCE reader with extensive experience in gastroenterology and endoscopy. For each image, two binary and tri-colour ground truth (GT) masks have been created in which each pixel has been indexed into two classes (clear and contaminated) and three classes (bubble, turbid fluids, and normal), respectively. To the best of the author's knowledge, there is no implemented clear and contaminated region segmentation on the capsule endoscopy reading software. Curated multicentre dataset can be utilized to implement applicable segmentation algorithms for identification of clear and contaminated regions and discrimination bubbles, as well as turbid fluids from normal tissue in the small intestine. Since the annotated images belong to three different sources, they provide a diverse representation of the clear and contaminated patterns in the WCE images. This diversity is valuable for training the models that are more robust to variations in data characteristics and can generalize well across different subjects and settings. The inclusion of images from three different centres allows for robust cross-validation opportunities, where computer vision-based models can be trained on one centre's annotated images and evaluated on others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.