ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
A simple cell proliferation assay and the inflammatory protein content show significant differences in human plasmas from young and old subjects.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial Transfer from Human Platelets to Rat Dental Pulp-Derived Fibroblasts in the 2D In Vitro System: Additional Implication in PRP Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Exploring the impact of age, sex and life experiences on plasma inflammatory profiles through comparative proteomics.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some studies showed a "rejuvenating" effect of exposing aging tissues to a young environment. In mouse heterochronic parabiosis experiments, in response to young organisms, old animals lived longer than isochrony old age-matched conjoint animals. Comparable "rejuvenating" effects were obtained by injecting young plasma in old mice. This raised great hopes of slowing down the senescence process in humans by the injection of young plasma, as well as to prevent or cure age-related diseases. Some clinical trials are currently being performed or were recently completed. However, these studies are small and of limited duration, and we still lack convincing evidence to support the effectiveness of young plasma injection. It is urgent to perform additional investigations, including the development of an assay to measure the cell proliferation induction capability of different human plasmas, before one can seriously think of a large-scale treatment of humans. We adopted a simple method to measure the potential of different plasmas in supporting cell line proliferation, regardless of the co-presence of a platelet lysate. By comparing plasmas from young and old subjects, we observed a decreased activity in plasmas from old individuals. The young plasma effect may be attributed to specific proteins and growth factors more abundant in younger individuals that could decrease with age. Alternatively, or at the same time, the reduced cell proliferation support could be due to inhibitors present in the old plasma. Studying the different protein content of young and old plasmas was out of the scope of this article. Such differences should be adequately investigated by proteomics using many samples. However, a preliminary study of the different protein content of young and old plasmas was part of the assay validation using a commercially available cytokine array for parallel determination of the relative levels of 105 selected human proteins. We could show the existence of specific differences between young and old plasmas and that plasmas from old individuals presented a higher concentration of "inflammatory" proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.