Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351041›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dementia2024

Meaningful patient and public engagement in dissemination-embedding co-production in dementia research.

Susanne de Wolf-Linder, Iris Kramer, Martina Hersperger, Maria Schubert, Sonja Bächi, Monika Stolz, Emma Wolverson, Christina Ramsenthaler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dementia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Involving People With Dementia in Research: Contributions, Barriers and Evaluation From a Meta-Synthesis and Qualitative Interview Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susanne de Wolf-LinderSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Zürich, Switzerland.
Iris KramerSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Zürich, Switzerland.
Martina Hersperger"Plattform Mäander" Foundation, Zürich, Switzerland.
Maria SchubertSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Zürich, Switzerland.
Sonja BächiSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Zürich, Switzerland.
Monika StolzDepartment of Health Sciences, PPIE Stakeholder Group for People With Dementia, Institute of Nursing, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Emma WolversonWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom.
Christina RamsenthalerSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is still underutilised in both dementia research and corresponding dissemination activities. Aim: To describe the methods, format, and lessons learned in co-creating and co-producing a dissemination strategy for a research project focused on establishing patient-centred outcome measures into routine palliative community care for persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their informal carers. Materials and methods: A participatory, hybrid-format workshop was conducted to co-create the dissemination strategy with a PPIE group. A video presentation of findings and a list of prompts shared prior to the workshop were used to elicit views on dissemination strategies and knowledge translation. The workshop was followed up with a survey to consolidate the dissemination strategy. Workshop minutes and survey responses were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis. Results: 22 participants from our diverse PPIE group attended the workshop. Two major themes emerged: (a) Knowledge translation: building bridges between research and practise, and (b) Collaboration and dissemination: everyone's voice is needed. Participants suggested critical changes to dissemination methods and materials. Successful knowledge translation depends on a strong evidence base. For this, materials need to be tailored to specific audiences. Everyone's voice needs to be integrated through co-production in dissemination activities by PPIE members to influence societal change. Tailored dissemination activities within a dissemination strategy were co-created spanning all phases of the research cycle. Discussion: Informing and educating the public and policymakers about the needs of PLWD relies on disseminating and fostering knowledge translation throughout all phases of the research cycle.

Indexed as

dementiadisseminationpalliative careparticipatory researchperson-centred careperson-centred outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID39351041
PMCPMC11439697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.