Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351026›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2023

Patient and Clinician Experience of Using Telehealth During the

Lewis Robinson, Charles Parsons, Korinne Northwood, Dan Siskind, Peter McArdle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Patient and provider attitudes toward video and phone telemental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lewis RobinsonMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Charles ParsonsMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Korinne NorthwoodMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Dan SiskindMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-9216
Peter McArdleMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic, mental health services adopted telehealth to facilitate ongoing assessment and treatment of patients with severe mental illness. We aimed to assess the telehealth experience of mental health patients and clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic to inform ongoing clinical telehealth service usage. Methods: Two participant cohorts were recruited: Patients with severe mental illness at a community public mental health service; and clinicians working within this service. Participants from both cohorts were surveyed regarding their experience of using telehealth. Results: The survey was completed by 44 patients and 51 clinicians. Most participants reported having access to appropriate telehealth technology. Among patients, 80% reported having participated in any telephone consultations, while 39% reported having taken part in video-telehealth consultations with their psychiatrist. Similarly, 77% of clinicians reported having used video telehealth. Patients reported feeling more confident with video telehealth if they were younger, lived with friends, family or partner, or had access to the internet or a smartphone. Patients reported that telehealth consultations were more convenient and may reduce nonattendance. They reported having good rapport when using video telehealth. The majority of clinicians reported feeling positively about assessing risk and delivering therapy using video telehealth but not with telephone consultations. Conclusions: Our study suggests that video telehealth is a feasible way of delivering mental health care and appears to be acceptable to both patients and clinicians. However, clinicians raised concerns about their ability to assess risk and provide therapy using telephone consultations. Patients also reported that the convenience of telehealth may improve engagement.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental Healthschizophreniatelehealthtelepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID39351026
PMCPMC11441319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.