ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Case report: Recurrence of primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors after resection of liver segments IV in 8 years follow-up.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Primary Hepatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Systematic Review and Expert Pathologist Reappraisal Using the WHO 6th Edition Framework.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (PHNETs) are an utterly rare entity. The diagnosis of PHNETs could legitimize when an extrahepatic primary NET must always be excluded. PHNETs can achieve a high survival rate after complete surgical resection, however, most patients still have an 18% risk of recurrence within 5 years after surgery. In our case, the recurrence occurred 8 years after the first hepatectomy, which is relatively rare in the current literature. Therefore, rigorous postoperative follow-up is necessary for early detection and timely treatment of recurrent PHNETs. Case information: We report a case of PHNET in a 24-year-old previously healthy female patient who relapsed 8 years after hepatectomy. This case focuses on the importance of diagnosis of primary and recurrent PHNETS in young patients, rare pathological types, and post-operative follow-up. Conclusion: This case report detailed the rare pathological morphology and characteristic immunohistochemical markers in our case for PHNETS, which enhanced the new understanding of the diagnosis of this entity. In addition, we also highlighted the variable duration of recurrence after treatment of PHNETs. The 8-year recurrent period in our case suggests the importance of regular examination in patients with PHNETs by following the doctor's instructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.