ArticleCureus2024
GPT-4 Vision: Multi-Modal Evolution of ChatGPT and Potential Role in Radiology.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- JADE-Plus: A Multimodal Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Large Language Framework for Diagnostic Support in Jawbone Lesions: Development and Technical Validation Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Algorithm: The Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Modern Surgery.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Seeing Beyond the Microscope: Artificial Intelligence and Fluorescence Confocal Digital Imaging in Pediatric Surgical Pathology.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Diagnostic capabilities of large language models in the detection of scaphoid fractures in the emergency department.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025Observational
- The Accuracy of ChatGPT-4o in Interpreting Chest and Abdominal X-Ray Images.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Utilizing GPT-4 to interpret oral mucosal disease photographs for structured report generation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating ChatGPT-4 for the Interpretation of Images from Several Diagnostic Techniques in Gastroenterology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Utilization of large language models in decision-making for sustainability in radiology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GPT-4 Vision (GPT-4V) represents a significant advancement in multimodal artificial intelligence, enabling text generation from images without specialized training. This marks the transformation of ChatGPT as a large language model (LLM) into GPT-4's promised large multimodal model (LMM). As these AI models continue to advance, they may enhance radiology workflow and aid with decision support. This technical note explores potential GPT-4V applications in radiology and evaluates performance for sample tasks. GPT-4V capabilities were tested using images from the web, personal and institutional teaching files, and hand-drawn sketches. Prompts evaluated scientific figure analysis, radiologic image reporting, image comparison, handwriting interpretation, sketch-to-code, and artistic expression. In this limited demonstration of GPT-4V's capabilities, it showed promise in classifying images, counting entities, comparing images, and deciphering handwriting and sketches. However, it exhibited limitations in detecting some fractures, discerning a change in size of lesions, accurately interpreting complex diagrams, and consistently characterizing radiologic findings. Artistic expression responses were coherent. WhileGPT-4V may eventually assist with tasks related to radiology, current reliability gaps highlight the need for continued training and improvement before consideration for any medical use by the general public and ultimately clinical integration. Future iterations could enable a virtual assistant to discuss findings, improve reports, extract data from images, provide decision support based on guidelines, white papers, and appropriateness criteria. Human expertise remain essential for safe practice and partnerships between physicians, researchers, and technology leaders are necessary to safeguard against risks like bias and privacy concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.