ArticleCureus2024
Can Hemogram Parameters and Derived Ratios Predict Conversion From Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for surgical removal of gallbladder today. In challenging cholecystectomy cases, conversion to an open technique may be necessary. Therefore, the preoperative prediction of conversion to open technique holds significant importance for patient safety and surgical strategy. In the literature, conversion to open cholecystectomy has been associated with many contradictory predictive factors. The aim of this study is to identify and comprehensively evaluate the predictive laboratory parameters and ratios associated with the conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Methods In this historical cohort study, the data of patients who were scheduled for and underwent LC between January 1, 2018, and September 1, 2023, were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative laboratory findings and surgical notes of the patients were reviewed retrospectively from the archives. The correlation between patient data and the cholecystectomy groups was analyzed, and comparisons were made between the groups. Results All 160 patients initially underwent a laparoscopic approach. In emergency cases, a statistically significant association was found between lymphocyte count (p = 0.017) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (p = 0.041) with operations completed laparoscopically and between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p = 0.007) and Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) (p = 0.031) with operations converted to open surgery. In elective cases, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (p = 0.024) and total bilirubin (TBIL) (p = 0.003) were found to have a statistically significant association with operations converted to open surgery. In the logistic regression analysis, hematological parameters and ratios were not found to have a statistically significant relationship in predicting the conversion to open surgery. Conclusion Although significant differences were observed in laboratory parameters and derived ratios such as the NLR and LMR, logistic regression analysis did not identify any of these measures as significant predictors of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.