ArticleCureus2024
Diagnostic Comparison of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Rotator Cuff Tears: A Study Conducted in the Population of Vijayapura.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound compared to magnetic resonance imaging for rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.International journal of burns and trauma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInjuries to the shoulder and restricted range of motion often lead to decreased work productivity, increased use of medical resources, and impaired quality of life. The most frequent cause of shoulder discomfort and dysfunction is a disease related to the rotator cuff, such as bursitis, degenerative tears, and calcific tendinosis. This study evaluates ultrasonography's diagnostic efficacy in relation to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODOLOGY: Prospective research was conducted at a hospital to compare MRI and ultrasonography for shoulder cases involving rotator cuff injuries. There were 53 patients in the sample. Those who presented with pain and dysfunction in the shoulder were given both an MRI and an ultrasound (USG). Comparing the results of the MRI and USG allowed for the calculation of the diagnostic tests' accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.
resultsThe results of the study demonstrated a substantial agreement (p value <0.05) between the identification of rotator cuff tears by MRI and USG shoulder imaging. With a total accuracy of 88.6%, the sensitivity and specificity of identifying rotator cuff tears were 91.2% and 81.8%, respectively.
conclusionWith similar sensitivity and specificity, MRI and USG are useful diagnostic techniques for rotator cuff injuries. USG is a great screening alternative due to its cost-effectiveness, noninvasiveness, and easy accessibility. However, when it comes to identifying the anatomical regions that need surgical repair, MRI is superior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.