ArticleCureus2024
Establishing Reference Values for Vaginal Vestibule Elastography in Healthy Postmenopausal Women.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aims to establish normative elastography values for the vaginal vestibule in healthy postmenopausal women and assess the variability of these values with age and measurement time during the day. Methods The study included 111 women aged 40-90, excluding those with medical histories or treatments affecting vaginal health. Elastography measurements were taken twice daily, between 9-10 AM and 3-4 PM, using real-time tissue elastography technology. Statistical analysis evaluated the effects of age, body mass index (BMI), and diurnal variation on vaginal vestibule elasticity. Results A significant positive correlation between age and elastography values was found (p=8.36×10⁻⁷), with elastography values increasing by approximately 0.0040 units per year. The mean elastography value was 28.32% (SD=5.87%) in the morning and 28.10% (SD=5.90%) in the afternoon, with a statistically significant difference (p=0.016). BMI showed a weak negative correlation with elastography values (r=-0.2021, p=0.0334). Conclusion Establishing reference values for vaginal vestibule elastography provides a foundation for improved diagnostic accuracy and early detection of gynecological conditions. The findings support the use of elastography as a non-invasive, reliable diagnostic tool in clinical practice. Future research should validate these results across different age groups and in women with specific gynecological conditions to further solidify the clinical applicability of vaginal vestibule elastography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.