ArticleCureus2024
Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement of Diuretic 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Upper Urinary Tract Cancer.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious reports attempted to evaluate bladder cancer using 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) by washing out the excreted FDG with a diuretic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of diuretic FDG PET/plain CT (drtPET/CT) and diuretic FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT (drtPET/ceCT) in the assessment of upper urinary tract cancers. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 66 patients underwent drtPET/CT for suspected upper urinary tract cancer (UUTC). The study targeted 29 patients who were strongly suspected of having UUTC and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper urinary tract. A total of 29 (24 male, five female) patients, with a mean ± SD age of 73 ± 3 (range, 43-84) years, had a suspected neoplasm in the upper urinary tract. They underwent FDG PET/plain and contrast-enhanced CT before and after a diuretic and MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). A urologist and a physician board-certified in nuclear medicine and radiology independently interpreted the standard PET/CT (stdPET/CT), drtPET/CT, drtPET/ceCT, ceCT, and MRI with DWI images. Interobserver agreement and the diagnostic performance of each modality were evaluated.
resultsThe kappa values of stdPET/CT, drtPET/CT, drtPET/ceCT, ceCT, and MRI were 0.381, 0.567, 0.7031, 0.448, and 0.185, respectively, with drtPET/ceCT showing the highest kappa value and the only one with good interobserver agreement (>60%). The area under the curve of drtPET/ceCT was 0.92, which was significantly higher than those of stdPET/CT (P=0.027) and MRI (P=0.047).
conclusionsIn the present study, drtPET/ceCT had the best diagnostic performance and the highest interobserver agreement for detecting upper urinary tract urothelial cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.