ArticleCureus2024
Pancreatitis Associated With Teduglutide: A Disproportionality Analysis via the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Teduglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-2 analog that is indicated for the treatment of short bowel syndrome (SBS) by reducing patient dependence on parenteral support. Due to the rarity of SBS as well as the recent timeline of the adoption of teduglutide, the safety of teduglutide is relatively poorly understood. Several recent clinical case reports have highlighted elevated pancreatic enzymes and pancreatitis as a concerning complication of teduglutide. This prompts a systematic study of the association between pancreatitis and teduglutide. Methods This study conducts a case-control design disproportionality analysis by using data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Reports from the first quarter of 2020 through the first quarter of 2024 were retrieved from this database, and a disproportionality analysis was conducted. The analysis consisted of traditional methods of analyzing adverse drug events such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR), as well as Bayesian methods such as the empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) and information component (IC). A confidence interval for ROR and PRR that excludes a ratio of 1 or a confidence interval for IC that excludes a score of 0 was used as the criterion for a statistically significant association between pancreatitis risk and teduglutide use. Results Out of 11,696 reports of teduglutide adverse effects in over four years of adverse effects data drawn from the FAERS database, 79 cases of pancreatitis were identified. The disproportionality analysis revealed an ROR of 3.73 (95% CI (2.99, 4.66)), a PRR of 3.71 (95% CI (2.97, 4.63)), an EBGM of 3.70, and an IC of 1.84 (95% CI (1.51, 2.16)). All of these statistics indicate a statistically significant association between pancreatitis risk and teduglutide use. Conclusion The results reveal a statistically significant association between pancreatitis risk and teduglutide use. Our findings highlight the necessity for the careful monitoring of pancreatitis in patients undergoing teduglutide therapy going forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.