ReviewCureus2024
Efficacy of Rituximab Versus Cyclophosphamide and Mycophenolate for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory systemic sclerosis after rituximab-bendamustine conditioning.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc), contributing to significant morbidity and mortality in affected individuals. The optimal treatment approach for SSc-associated ILD remains uncertain, with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate among potential therapeutic options. This systematic review aims to evaluate and synthesize the existing evidence on the efficacy of rituximab compared to cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate for the treatment of ILD in patients with systemic sclerosis. A comprehensive search of the following electronic databases, PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, has been conducted to identify relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials, systematic review and meta-analysis, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective cohort studies. Data on study characteristics, participant demographics, interventions, outcomes, and key findings have been extracted and synthesized. The risk of bias in the included studies has been assessed using appropriate tools such as the Cochrane Bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials, the New Castle Ottawa tool for cohort studies, and the AMSTAR checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The research team ultimately selected 15 high-quality studies for review. Rituximab demonstrated similar efficacy to cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate in improving lung function (forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO)), with fewer severe adverse events. Cyclophosphamide, while effective, had higher toxicity, leading to more frequent adverse events such as leukopenia and infections. Mycophenolate showed comparable efficacy to cyclophosphamide but with fewer side effects, making it a well-tolerated alternative. The findings of this systematic review will provide valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate in the management of ILD in systemic sclerosis, informing clinical decision-making and guiding future research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.