Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350816›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Ex Vivo Irritation Evaluation of a Novel Brimonidine Nanoemulsion Using the Hen's Egg Test on Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM).

Shahla S Smail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Green-SynthesizedJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Conjugation ofPharmaceutics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shahla S SmailDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, IRQ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe hen's egg test on chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) assay is a cost-effective and well-validated, non-animal-based MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, surfactant-cosurfactant blends were prepared by mixing Tween 80 (surfactant) and propylene glycol (cosurfactant) in a 4:1(v/v) ratio. Triacetin served as the oil phase, while deionized water was used as the aqueous phase. Using the drop method, a range of NE formulations (F1, F2, F3, FB1, FB2, and FB3) were developed and subsequently evaluated for their potential to irritate, and then the results were compared to those of a commercially available BR eye drop formulation.

resultsAccording to the average cumulative HET-CAM test scores (IS), from excipients, propylene glycol caused moderate irritation by causing slight damage to blood vessels. The formulations FB1 and F1 were found to have the highest level of irritation among other formulations in the investigation, recording 1.05 ±0.07 and 1.2 ±0.10, respectively. All other NE formulations exhibited non-irritating potential, as confirmed by the HET-CAM test, and were comparable to the marketed BR eye drop formulation.

conclusionThe NE formulations created for BR were determined to be safe and non-irritating. The findings indicate that the prepared NE could be a beneficial solution for addressing problems with conventional eye drops and delivering BR effectively to the eyes.

Indexed as

brimonidinehet-camirritationnanoemuslionpropylene glycol

Identifiers

PMID39350816
PMCPMC11440450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.