Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350794›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2024

The use of

N H Aneck-Hahn, M C Van Zijl, L Quinn, C Swiegelaar, N Nhlapo, W de Bruin, L Korsten

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N H Aneck-HahnEnvironmental Chemical Pollution and Health Research Unit, School of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
M C Van ZijlEnvironmental Chemical Pollution and Health Research Unit, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
L QuinnOrganic Analysis Laboratory, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
C SwiegelaarOrganic Analysis Laboratory, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
N NhlapoOrganic Analysis Laboratory, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
W de BruinDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
L KorstenDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fruit- and vegetable-processing facilities may contaminate wastewater via contaminants found in the produce and disinfecting chemicals used. These contaminants may include agrochemicals, pesticides, and disinfectants such as chlorine and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). Some compounds may exhibit harmful endocrine-disrupting activity. This study investigated the impact of a minimally processed vegetable facility on wastewater quality via

Indexed as

chemical screeningdisinfectantsendocrine-disrupting chemicalsestrogenic activityfood-processing facilityin vitro bioassayspesticideswastewater

Identifiers

PMID39350794
PMCPMC11439871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.