ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Graph neural pre-training based drug-target affinity prediction.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- KAN-GIN: Adaptive Nonlinear Molecular Representation Learning for Drug-Target Affinity Prediction.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- MoleProLink-RL: geometric transport for domain-policy reinforcement learning in drug-target interaction prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Tomato seedling stem and leaf segmentation method based on an improved ResNet architecture.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational drug-target affinity prediction has the potential to accelerate drug discovery. Currently, pre-training models have achieved significant success in various fields due to their ability to train the model using vast amounts of unlabeled data. However, given the scarcity of drug-target interaction data, pre-training models can only be trained separately on drug and target data, resulting in features that are insufficient for drug-target affinity prediction. To address this issue, in this paper, we design a graph neural pre-training-based drug-target affinity prediction method (GNPDTA). This approach comprises three stages. In the first stage, two pre-training models are utilized to extract low-level features from drug atom graphs and target residue graphs, leveraging a large number of unlabeled training samples. In the second stage, two 2D convolutional neural networks are employed to combine the extracted drug atom features and target residue features into high-level representations of drugs and targets. Finally, in the third stage, a predictor is used to predict the drug-target affinity. This approach fully utilizes both unlabeled and labeled training samples, enhancing the effectiveness of pre-training models for drug-target affinity prediction. In our experiments, GNPDTA outperforms other deep learning methods, validating the efficacy of our approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.