ReviewActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2025
Suicide methods and severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Suicidal risk in patients with aggression in schizophrenia: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Do virtual reality-based therapies affect symptomatology and psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis.BJPsych open · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review on Toxidromes in the Psychiatric Population: Implications for Overdose Prevention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Investigating the Relationship Between Hopelessness, Alexithymia, Mind Wandering, Rumination, and Clinical Features in Patients with Bipolar Disorder.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Suicide methods and severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2025Review
- Trends in the complexity of self-harm hospitalisations over 11 years at a major regional hospital in Victoria, Australia: a retrospective study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPeople with severe mental illness (SMI) have a higher risk of suicide compared with the general population. However, variations in suicide methods between people with different SMIs have not been examined. The aim of this pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42022351748) systematic review was to pool the odds of people with SMI who die by suicide versus those with no SMI, stratified by suicide method.
methodsSearches were conducted on December 11, 2023 across PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Embase. Eligible studies were those that reported suicide deaths stratified by SMI and suicide methods. Studies were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis, and risk of bias was measured by the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.
resultsAfter screening, 12 studies were eligible (n = 380,523). Compared with those with no SMI, people with schizophrenia had 3.38× higher odds of jumping from heights (95% CI: 2.08-5.50), 1.93× higher odds of drowning (95% CI: 1.50-2.48). People with bipolar disorder also had 3.2× higher odds of jumping from heights (95% CI: 2.70-3.78). Finally, people with major depression had 3.11× higher odds of drug overdose (95% CI: 1.53-6.31), 2.11× higher odds of jumping from heights (95% CI: 1.93-2.31), and 2.33× lower odds of dying by firearms (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.56). No studies were classified as high risk of bias, and no outcomes had high levels of imprecision or indirectness.
conclusionThese findings could inform lethal means counselling practices in this population. Additionally individual, clinical, community and public health interventions for people with SMI should prioritise, where feasible, means restriction including access to heights or drugs to overdose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.