Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350646›Full record

SynthesisClinical cardiology2024

Pulsed-Field Ablation in Management of Ventricular Tachycardia: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Clinical Outcomes.

Amir Askarinejad, Erfan Kohansal, Amirreza Sabahizadeh, Hamed Hesami, Sara Adimi, Majid Haghjoo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancements in mapping, cardiac imaging, and ablation techniques for the management of ventricular tachycardias.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Safety and efficacy of a lattice-tip catheter for ventricular arrhythmia ablation: the AFFERA Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation Registry (AVAAR).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amir AskarinejadRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Institue, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-079X
Erfan KohansalRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Institue, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4095-4824
Amirreza SabahizadehSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hamed HesamiRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Institue, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sara AdimiCardiovascular Epidemiology Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Majid HaghjooCardiac Electrophysiology Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a cutting-edge technique that employs non-thermal energy to cause cell death by inducing irreversible electroporation of cell membranes. This systematic review evaluates the PFA effectiveness as a potential alternative to radiofrequency and cryo-ablation for treating ventricular tachycardia.

methodsPubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched using keywords related to ventricular tachycardia and pulsed-field ablation. Eligible Studies evaluating this therapeutic approach for ventricular tachycardia were included in the final analysis.

resultsWe included six studies (five case reports and one case series) in our systematic review. Eight (88.8%) of procedures were successful with 100% long-term efficacy. No procedural complications or ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence were observed in the cases.

conclusionThe absence of complications, high effectiveness, and long-term success rate make PFAs a good VT treatment option. However, PFA safety and efficacy studies for VT treatment are scarce. Thus, larger investigations on this topic are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Tachycardia, VentricularCase Reports as TopicCatheter AblationHumansTreatment Outcomecatheter ablationpulsed‐field ablationventricular arrhythmiaventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID39350646
PMCPMC11442986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.