ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2024
Retinal vascular changes after Silicon Oil removal in the Eye with Rhegmatogenous Retinal detachment.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to examine vessel density changes in the optic nerve and macula following silicone oil removal (SOR) surgery in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) at different time points by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) in compared to the contralateral eye.
methodsA total of 43 eyes from 43 patients with silicone oil in their eyes for 3-9 months underwent OCT-A using AngioVue and optic disc-associated vessel density (VD) and thickness, macular-associated VD and thickness, Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, FAZ perimeter (PERIM), Acircularity index (AI), vessel density within a 300 μm wide region of the FAZ were compared between eyes. OCTA scans were performed one week before SOR and one month and three months after SOR.
resultsThe mean age of participants was 52.8 years (SD = 15.85) and a median visual acuity was 0.8 (range: 0.5-1.0). Notably, male participants constituted 67.4% of the sample. The preoperative mean value BCVA (logMAR) of patients was 0.73, and 3 months post-oil removal was 0.7727. Regarding optic disc parameters, RNFL thickness and vessel density (VD) measurements Peripapillary, whole disc, inside disc, and Disc Angio (superior, Nasal, inferior, temporal) did not change. In analyzing macular thickness parameters, all of them (Whole and Fovea, parafoveal, and Perifovea) remained unchanged. Examining macular vessel density parameters revealed no significant changes across superficial and deep retinal layers. Finally, the comparison of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and flow density (FD) parameters demonstrated consistent measurements with non-significant alterations observed in FAZ size (p = 0.6) and FD values (p = 0.49) over the monitored duration.
conclusionThere was no change in peripapillary VD and macular vessel density of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) after silicone oil removal. FAZ and full retinal thickness remained stable 3 month after SOR. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.