Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350295›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2024

Effects of implementation strategies on nursing practice and patient outcomes: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Guillaume Fontaine, Billy Vinette, Charlene Weight, Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte, Andréane Lavallée, Marie-France Deschênes, Alexandra Lapierre, Sonia A Castiglione, Gabrielle Chicoine, Geneviève Rouleau and 12 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Clinical Issues - August 2026.AORN journal · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Guillaume FontaineIngram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 680 Rue Sherbrooke West, 18Th Floor, Office 1812, Montréal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada. guil.fontaine@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7806-814X
Billy VinetteFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, 2375 Chemin de La Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1A8, Canada.
Charlene WeightIngram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 680 Rue Sherbrooke West, 18Th Floor, Office 1812, Montréal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada.
Marc-André Maheu-CadotteFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, 2375 Chemin de La Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1A8, Canada.
Andréane LavalléeDivision of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, 3659 Broadway, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Marie-France DeschênesFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, 2375 Chemin de La Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1A8, Canada.
Alexandra LapierreCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, 1050 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec City, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada.
Sonia A CastiglioneIngram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 680 Rue Sherbrooke West, 18Th Floor, Office 1812, Montréal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada.
Gabrielle ChicoineResearch Centre of the Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Geneviève RouleauDepartment of Nursing, Université du Québec en Outaouais, 283, Boulevard Alexandre-Taché, Gatineau, QC, J8X 3X7, Canada.
Nikolas ArgiropoulosCentre for Nursing Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, CIUSSS West-Central Montreal, 3755 Chem. de La Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Kristin KonnyuHealth Services Research Unit, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Meagan MooneyIngram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 680 Rue Sherbrooke West, 18Th Floor, Office 1812, Montréal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada.
Christine E CassidySchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, 5869 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Tanya MailhotFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, 2375 Chemin de La Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1A8, Canada.
Patrick LavoieFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, 2375 Chemin de La Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1A8, Canada.
Catherine PépinCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, 143, Rue Wolfe, Lévis, QC, G6V 3Z1, Canada.
Sylvie CossetteFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, 2375 Chemin de La Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1A8, Canada.
Marie-Pierre GagnonCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, 1050 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec City, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada.
Sonia SemenicIngram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 680 Rue Sherbrooke West, 18Th Floor, Office 1812, Montréal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada.
Nicola StraitonNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and the Australian Catholic University, 390 Victoria St, Level 5 deLacy Building, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Sandy MiddletonNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and the Australian Catholic University, 390 Victoria St, Level 5 deLacy Building, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation strategies targeting individual healthcare professionals and teams, such as audit and feedback, educational meetings, opinion leaders, and reminders, have demonstrated potential in promoting evidence-based nursing practice. This systematic review examined the effects of the 19 Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization Care (EPOC) healthcare professional-level implementation strategies on nursing practice and patient outcomes.

methodsA systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook, with six databases searched up to February 2023 for randomized studies and non-randomized controlled studies evaluating the effects of EPOC implementation strategies on nursing practice. Study selection and data extraction were performed in Covidence. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted in RevMan, while studies not eligible for meta-analysis were synthesized narratively based on the direction of effects. The quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

resultsOut of 21,571 unique records, 204 studies (152 randomized, 52 controlled, non-randomized) enrolling 36,544 nurses and 340,320 patients were included. Common strategies (> 10% of studies) were educational meetings, educational materials, guidelines, reminders, audit and feedback, tailored interventions, educational outreach, and opinion leaders. Implementation strategies as a whole improved clinical practice outcomes compared to no active intervention, despite high heterogeneity. Group and individual education, patient-mediated interventions, reminders, tailored interventions and opinion leaders had statistically significant effects on clinical practice outcomes. Individual education improved nurses' attitude, knowledge, perceived control, and skills, while group education also influenced perceived social norms. Although meta-analyses indicate a small, non-statistically significant effect of multifaceted versus single strategies on clinical practice, the narrative synthesis of non-meta-analyzed studies shows favorable outcomes in all studies comparing multifaceted versus single strategies. Group and individual education, as well as tailored interventions, had statistically significant effects on patient outcomes.

conclusionsMultiple types of implementation strategies may enhance evidence-based nursing practice, though effects vary due to strategy complexity, contextual factors, and variability in outcome measurement. Some evidence suggests that multifaceted strategies are more effective than single component strategies. Effects on patient outcomes are modest. Healthcare organizations and implementation practitioners may consider employing multifaceted, tailored strategies to address local barriers, expand the use of underutilized strategies, and assess the long-term impact of strategies on nursing practice and patient outcomes.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42019130446.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based NursingHumansImplementation ScienceClinical practiceHealthcare professional behaviorImplementation strategiesKnowledge translation strategiesNursesNursing practicePatient outcomesProfessional practiceQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID39350295
PMCPMC11443951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.