Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350291›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2024

Exploring the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a real-time cardiac telerehabilitation and tele coaching programme using wearable devices in people with a recent myocardial infarction.

A Mitropoulos, Μ Anifanti, G Koukouvou, Α Ntovoli, K Alexandris, Evangelia Kouidi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06071273 (Development of an Online Platform for Self-service of People Living With Chronic Cardiovascular Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06071273 nacompletednot on this map

Development of an Online Platform for Self-service of People Living With Chronic Cardiovascular Diseases

TypeinterventionalSponsorAristotle University Of ThessalonikiRan2023 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsGroup A: online real-time home based exercise using the online platform, Group B: supervised community based exercise intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A MitropoulosLaboratory of Sport Medicine, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thermi, Thessaloniki, 57001, Greece.
Μ AnifantiLaboratory of Sport Medicine, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thermi, Thessaloniki, 57001, Greece.
G KoukouvouLaboratory of Sport Medicine, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thermi, Thessaloniki, 57001, Greece.
Α NtovoliLaboratory of Management of Sports Recreation and Tourism, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
K AlexandrisLaboratory of Management of Sports Recreation and Tourism, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Evangelia KouidiLaboratory of Sport Medicine, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thermi, Thessaloniki, 57001, Greece. kouidi@phed.auth.gr.

Funding

'Innovation Investment Schemes' in the framework of the Operational Program of Central Macedonia 2021-2027 and it is co-funded by the European Social Fund through the National Strategic Reference Framework Project code KMP6-0076626, MIS 6002766.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) constitutes the recommended nonpharmacological approach for cardiac patients with cardiovascular disease such as people following a recent (i.e., < 4 week) myocardial infarction (MI). Recent evidence suggests that cardiac telerehabilitation may be as effective as traditional (i.e., in person) CR in people following a recent MI. Nevertheless, the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of such an exercise programme has yet to be examined.

methodsForty-four (11 women, 33 men) people following a recent MI were randomly allocated into two groups (online home-based and gym-based groups). The groups underwent a 24-week CR programme thrice per week. All patients performed the baseline, and 24 weeks follow up measurements where feasibility, acceptability, and safety were assessed.

resultsEligibility and recruitment rates were found to be 61.5% and 42%, respectively. Compliance to the thrice weekly, 24-week exercise programme for the online- and gym-based groups were 91.6% and 90.9%, respectively. There were no dropouts during the exercise programmes, however four participants, two from each group, were lost to follow up at 6 months. The average percentage of peak HR (% HR

conclusionOur cardiac telerehabilitation programme seems to be feasible, acceptable, safe, and enjoyable for people with a recent MI. Our participants had an overall positive experience and acceptability of the cardiac telerehabilitation and tele coaching using wearable devices.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov, ID NCT06071273, 10/02/2023, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Aerobic exerciseCardiac exerciseCardiac patientsResistance training

Identifiers

PMID39350291
PMCPMC11443730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.