ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2024
Short pulse grid and subthreshold micropulse laser (the sandwich grid) plus intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of two laser treatment procedures combined, short pulse grid laser (SP) and subthreshold micropulse laser (MP) (the sandwich grid [SWG] technique), plus intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) on central subfield thickness (CSFT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular sensitivity in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
methodsForty-five eyes (of 33 patients) with center-involving DME were treated with the SWG laser technique plus IVR and followed for 12 months. Laser treatment was performed at baseline: SP laser spots were placed in a grid pattern in the macular area (500 µm from the fovea) according to the extension of DME; subsequently, MP laser was delivered up to the edge of the fovea. MP laser re-treatment sessions could be performed every 3 months if DME was present and CSFT was ≥ 300 μm on SD-OCT. IVR injection was performed at baseline and repeated monthly if CSFT > 300µm. Preoperatively and monthly, ophthalmological examination was performed including measurements of BCVA, CSFT, and macular sensitivity.
resultsOne-year follow-up data is available for 37 eyes of 27 patients. Mean ± SE CSFT (µm) was 509.36 ± 25.14 and 325.76 ± 15.34 at baseline and 12 months, respectively. A significant reduction in mean CSFT was observed at all study visits compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Mean ± SE BCVA (logMAR) was 0.62 ± 0.04 and 0.45 ± 0.04 at baseline and 12 months, respectively. A significant improvement in mean BCVA was observed at all study visits compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Mean ± SE macular sensitivity (dB) was 17.85 ± 0.80 and improved to 19.05 ± 0.59 after one year of follow-up (p = 0.006). The mean number of IVR injections was 8.29 ± 0.63. The mean number of MP laser procedures including the initial SWG laser session was 3.67 ± 0.22. No ocular or systemic adverse effects were observed.
conclusionThe SWG laser technique plus IVR was associated with significant improvement in macular edema, BCVA, and macular sensitivity in patients with center-involving DME. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER (CAAE): 22969019.4.0000.5440.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.