Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350220›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Study on medical dispute prediction model and its clinical-application effectiveness based on machine learning.

Jicheng Li, Tao Zhu, Lin Wang, Luxi Yang, Yulong Zhu, Rui Li, Yubo Li, Yongcong Chen, Lingqing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jicheng LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Tao Zhu *Department of Administrative Supervision, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Lin WangDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Luxi YangKey Laboratory of Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Yulong ZhuSchool of Earth Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Rui LiLanzhou University Second Hospital Information Center, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Yubo LiDepartment of Medical Safety, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Yongcong ChenSchool of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China. cyc@lzu.edu.cn.
Lingqing ZhangDepartment of Medical Safety, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, China. 13919103081@163.com.

Funding

Cuiying Science and Technology Innovation" project [grant number: ZX-62000003-2022-611Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Department youth fund 22JR11RA076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical dispute is a global public health issue, which has been garnering increasing attention. In this study, we used machine learning (ML) method to establish a dispute prediction model and explored the clinical-application efficiency of this model in effectively reducing the occurrence of medical disputes.

methodsRetrospective study of All disputes filed by Gansu Medical Mediation Committee from 2019 to 2021 and patients with the same hospital level as that of the dispute group and hospitalization year were randomly selected as the control group in 1:1 ratio. SPSS software was used for univariate feature selection of the 14 factors that may cause disputes, and factors with statistical differences were selected. The data were divided into training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio. Six ML models were selected, and Python was used to establish a dispute prediction model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, average precision (AP), and F1 score were used to characterize the fitting and accuracy of the models, while decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate their clinical utility.

resultsA total of 1189 patients in the dispute and control groups were extracted. Following 11 influencing factors were selected: the inpatient department, doctor title, patient age, patient gender, patient occupation, payment method, hospitalization days, hospitalization times, discharge method, blood transfusion volume, and hospitalization espenses. Compared to other models, the AUC (0.945, 95% CI 0.913-0.981), Sensitivity (0.887), Accuracy (0.887), AP (0.834), and F1 score (0.880) of the random forest model were higher than those of other models, while the DCA curve indicated its high clinical benefits.

conclusionsInpatient department, hospitalization expenses, and discharge type are the primary influencing factors of dispute. Random forest exhibited high dispute prediction and clinical-application value and is expected to be promoted for offline dispute prediction.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesClinical effectivenessMachine learningMedical disputePrediction model

Identifiers

PMID39350220
PMCPMC11443660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.