Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350180›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Clinical, radiographic and biochemical assessment of proximal cavities restored with composite resin using incremental vs. bulk packing techniques: One-year randomized clinical trial.

Monaliza Maher Abdelaziz, Shereen Fathy, Amany Ahmed Alaraby, Wessam Ibrahim Shehab, Marwa Mohamed Temirek

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07429747 (Performance of Reinforced 3D-Printed Versus Direct Bulk-Filled Resin Composites for Restoring Extensive Class II Cavities in Vital Molars), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07429747 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Performance of Reinforced 3D-Printed Versus Direct Bulk-Filled Resin Composites for Restoring Extensive Class II Cavities in Vital Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAhmed Reda Abd EL RahmanRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsClass II Lesions, 3D Printing, Bulk Fill, Proximal Cavities of Posterior TeethArms3D-printed Ceramic reinforced resin restoration, bulk fill composite
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monaliza Maher AbdelazizDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, 6th of October, 12563, Egypt.
Shereen FathyDepartment of Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, 6th of October, 12563, Egypt.
Amany Ahmed AlarabyDepartment of Oral Medicine, Periodontology & Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, 6th of October, 12563, Egypt.
Wessam Ibrahim ShehabDepartment of Oral Medicine, Periodontology & Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, 6th of October, 12563, Egypt.
Marwa Mohamed TemirekDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Fayoum University, Fayoum, 63514, Egypt. mma25@fayoum.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBulk-fill resin composites may suffer from recurrent caries around compound proximal restorations in posterior teeth, especially at the proximo-gingival interface.Over 12 months, will the bulk fill technique affect the caries recurrence rate at gingival margins when compared to the conventional incremental packing technique? How early will the first clinical, radiographical, and biochemical evidence of caries recurrence occur?

methodsAfter randomization, in 30 patients with two compound (OM or OD) supragingival lesions, one tooth was restored using the bulk fill technique on one side (group 1) (n = 15). In contrast, the other tooth on the other side was restored utilizing the incremental layering technique (group 2) (n = 15). Both teeth received restorative material (X-tra fil, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany). The FDI criteria were used to evaluate restorations. As for the periodontal assessment, the gingival index, plaque index, papillary bleeding scoring index and periodontal pocket depth were evaluated. The gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) specimens were gathered, and MMP-9 was extracted and quantitated by ELISA. A customized radiographic template was designed, and 3D printed digital bitewing radiographs were taken. Assessments were done clinically, radiographically and biochemically at baseline (1 week) and after 3, 6 and 12 months. Data was statistically analyzed.

resultsThe null hypothesis was accepted clinically; no statistically significant differences appeared between bulk and incrementally filled posterior restorations. As for the radiographic assessment, the null hypothesis was accepted except for increased periodontal ligament width at 3 months. The null hypothesis for the biochemical evaluation was rejected as there were significant changes in levels of MMP-9 at different testing times.

conclusions1. With similar results but less sensitivity and significant time saving, the bulk fill technique can be considered an efficient alternative to the incremental fill technique in restoring proximal cavities. 2. Early evidence of caries recurrence can be correlated to an increase in the MMP-9 level in gingival crevicular fluid, followed by an increase in radiographic periodontal ligament width measurement.

trial registrationAn ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, (Approval No. RECO6U/5-2022). The study was registered at the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry on 24/07/2023 with an identification number (PACTR202307573531455).

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental CariesDental Restoration, PermanentGingival Crevicular FluidPeriodontal IndexAdultDental Plaque IndexFemaleHumansMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 9Middle AgedRadiography, BitewingRecurrenceYoung AdultComposite ResinsMatrix Metalloproteinase 9Bulk fill compositeMMP-9Periodontal assessmentRadiographic assessmentRecurrent caries

Identifiers

PMID39350180
PMCPMC11443838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.