Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350160›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2024

Comparing the diagnostic value of targeted with metagenomic next-generation sequencing in immunocompromised patients with lower respiratory tract infection.

Muyun Wei, Shaowei Mao, Shuangshuang Li, Kangyi Gu, Dejian Gu, Shengjie Bai, Xinhua Lu, Min Li

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification ofJournal of proteome research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muyun Wei *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, China. wmy2940@sjtu.edu.cn.
Shaowei Mao *School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shuangshuang LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, China.
Kangyi GuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, China.
Dejian GuGeneplus-Beijing Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Shengjie BaiGeneplus-Beijing Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xinhua LuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, China.
Min LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, China. rjlimin@shsmu.edu.cn.

Funding

3-Year Action Plan for Strengthening Public Health System in Shanghai GWVI-11.1-1National Key Research and Development Program 2022YFC2603800Yangfan Project of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23YF1431300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate identification of the etiology of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) is crucial, particularly for immunocompromised patients with more complex etiologies. The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enhanced the effectiveness of pathogen detection. However, assessments of the clinical diagnostic value of targeted NGS (tNGS) in immunocompromised patients with LRTI are limited.

methodsTo evaluate the diagnostic value of tNGS in immunocompromised patients with LRTI, a total of 88 patients, of whom 54 were immunocompromised, were enrolled. These patients underwent tNGS testing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Results from both metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and conventional microbiological tests (CMT) were also available for all participants. The performance of tNGS was assessed by comparing its findings against mNGS, CMT, and the clinical composite diagnosis.

resultsIn the cohort of 88 patients, tNGS showed comparable diagnostic value to mNGS and was significantly superior to CMT. Compared to CMT and composite reference standard, tNGS showed sensitivity of 94.55% and 90.48%, respectively. In immunocompromised patients, despite a more diverse pathogen variety, tNGS maintained similar sensitivity to mNGS and outperformed CMT. tNGS positively influenced etiologic diagnosis and antibiotic decision-making in 72.72% of cases, leading to a change in antibiotic regimen in 17.05% of cases. We also compared the detection of microbial nucleic acids by tNGS with mNGS and found that tNGS could identify 87.99% of the microbial nucleic acids identified by mNGS.

conclusionIn summary, our study demonstrated that tNGS offers promising clinical diagnostic accuracy in immunocompromised patients, as evidenced by its favorable comparison with CMT, the composite reference standard, and mNGS.

Indexed as

Bronchoalveolar Lavage FluidHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingImmunocompromised HostMetagenomicsRespiratory Tract InfectionsAdultAgedBacteriaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultImmunocompromised patientsLRTIMetagenomic next-generation sequencingPathogenTargeted next-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39350160
PMCPMC11443791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.